Linked from

The 63 pages that link to Source criticism, each with the reason it gives.

• ProtohistoryRelated: External accounts require scrutiny for political aims and cultural misunderstanding.

• Quintus Fabius PictorRelated: His work is lost, so historians must assess later writers who quote or adapt it.

• Tertiary sourceRelated: Tracing a tertiary claim to its sources helps assess what the summary leaves out.

• Argument from authorityRelated: These checks expose whether an authority’s assertion deserves evidential weight.

• Auxiliary sciences of historyRelated: It integrates specialist findings into judgments about what a source can establish.

• Evidence and documentation for the HolocaustRelated: It helps distinguish what a document directly establishes from what requires further evidence.

• GeisteswissenschaftRelated: Source criticism tests the provenance and reliability of cultural and historical evidence.

• Gell-Mann amnesia effectRelated: Assessing each report and its evidence counters blanket judgments based on one observed failure.

• Guillaume DelisleRelated: Delisle weighed travelers’ reports and older authorities before incorporating them into maps.

• Lucius Cincius AlimentusRelated: Assessing Alimentus depends on separating later quotation from the lost author’s own account.

• Martha Mitchell effectRelated: Evaluating both the claimant and independent records avoids treating status or diagnosis as proof.

• PallywoodRelated: It offers a case-by-case method distinct from applying a blanket pejorative label.

• StobaeusRelated: Comparing his excerpts with surviving works helps identify editorial choices and textual changes.