Linked from

The 63 pages that link to Command responsibility, each with the reason it gives.

• Josef KramerRelated: Kramer’s position raised questions about an officer’s liability for abuses committed within a camp.

• Kang Kek IewRelated: Duch’s case examined his responsibility as the superior directing S-21.

• Naser OrićRelated: The prosecution’s case tested whether Orić bore legal responsibility for crimes by forces under his command.

• Non-commissioned officerRelated: NCO leadership entails responsibility for personnel and tasks within assigned limits.

• Théoneste BagosoraRelated: The case tested how far senior officers could be held liable for crimes committed by forces under their authority.

• Akira MutōRelated: The tribunal assessed Mutō’s responsibility in light of his authority over Japanese forces.

• Ben FerenczRelated: The prosecution examined how leaders organized, directed, and bore responsibility for mass killings.

• Crime of apartheidRelated: It can connect leaders to apartheid crimes committed through subordinate institutions.

• Genocidal rapeRelated: It raises questions about accountability when leaders enable or fail to prevent genocidal sexual violence.

• Joseph KonyRelated: Kony’s leadership raised questions about responsibility for crimes committed by LRA forces.

• Sepp DietrichRelated: Dietrich’s conviction raised questions about what commanders knew and could control.

• Slobodan PraljakRelated: The judgment considered the duties attached to Praljak’s military authority.

• Wartime sexual violenceRelated: It connects patterns of abuse to commanders who could have acted against them.