Linked from

The 45 pages that link to Community-based conservation, each with the reason it gives.

• CITESRelated: CITES trade restrictions can affect communities that depend on wildlife use and commerce.

• Wildlife tradeCompared with: It offers a pathway for addressing trade pressures while recognizing local rights and livelihoods.

• Biodiversity conservationRelated: Local participation can align conservation measures with livelihoods and knowledge.

• Traditional ecological knowledgeRelated: It provides a setting for community knowledge to shape conservation goals and practice.

• PoachingRelated: Local participation can reduce incentives for illegal hunting and improve monitoring.

• EthnobotanyRelated: Ethnobotanical knowledge can support conservation shaped by the people who manage local plant resources.

• Wildlife traffickingRelated: Local livelihoods and stewardship can reduce incentives for illegal extraction.

• Trophy huntingRelated: Supporters argue that hunting income can create local incentives to conserve wildlife.

• Wildlife tourismRelated: Local participation can shape whether tourism revenue supports conservation and nearby livelihoods.

• Biosphere reserveRelated: It connects biodiversity goals with the livelihoods and knowledge of people living in reserves.

• Illegal wildlife tradeRelated: Local stewardship and viable livelihoods can reduce incentives for illegal harvesting.

• Mangrove restorationRelated: Local stewardship can shape project design, access, maintenance, and long-term survival.

• Sacred grovesRelated: Customary grove protections often depend on community rules and stewardship.

• Sea turtle conservationNarrower topic: Local support can determine whether nesting protections are accepted and sustained.

• Traditional knowledgeRelated: Conservation programs can draw on community knowledge of species and places.

• Anti-poachingRelated: Local participation can improve reporting, legitimacy, and incentives to protect wildlife.

• Primate conservationRelated: Local participation can make habitat protection more durable and reduce conflict over resource use.

• Sacred natural sitesRelated: Customary protection makes community authority central to conserving many sacred places.

• Protected area managementRelated: Local participation can improve legitimacy and support for management measures.

• Cultural heritage preservationRelated: Local authority can shape which forms of care are appropriate and sustainable.

• Deforestation in MadagascarRelated: Community stewardship can align forest protection with local needs and livelihoods.

• Important Bird and Biodiversity AreasRelated: Local stewardship can help maintain IBA habitats beyond formal protected-area boundaries.

• Nature conservationRelated: Local participation can align protection with livelihoods and place-based knowledge.

• Nature reserveRelated: Local participation can shape reserve rules, benefits, and long-term support.

• Crop raidingRelated: Local participation can align crop protection with community livelihoods and wildlife conservation.

• Mesoamerican Biological CorridorRelated: Local participation shapes whether corridor measures fit lived land use.

• Snow leopardRelated: Local participation can align snow leopard protection with mountain livelihoods.

• Elephant poachingRelated: Local incentives and costs can influence whether anti-poaching measures endure.

• Indigenous peoples of the AmazonRelated: Many Amazonian communities combine territorial authority with practices that sustain forest ecosystems.

• Transboundary protected areaRelated: Local support can determine whether cross-border rules work beyond government agreements.

• World Monuments FundRelated: Local participation helps projects reflect the needs and knowledge of people connected to sites.

• Kruger National ParkRelated: Kruger’s neighboring communities and land agreements test how conservation benefits can be shared.

• Red pandaRelated: Local stewardship can reduce habitat damage and support coexistence in red panda range.

• Black rhinocerosRelated: Local participation can strengthen protection and make recovery compatible with livelihoods.

• Cross River gorillaRelated: Local participation helps address hunting and habitat loss near gorilla forests.

• Grévy's zebraRelated: Local stewardship is central to protecting habitat and reducing conflict in its range.

• EthnobiologyRelated: Ethnobiological research can document practices and priorities relevant to locally led conservation.

• MarkhorRelated: Local participation has been central to several markhor protection programs.

• Ecological anthropologyRelated: It applies ecological and cultural analysis to the design of conservation institutions.

• Okapi Wildlife ReserveRelated: Local participation is central to managing forest use around the reserve.

• Salonga National ParkRelated: Long-term protection depends partly on relationships with communities around Salonga.

• Band-e Amir National ParkRelated: Local participation is central to safeguarding lakes and sustaining support for protection.

• Manovo-Gounda St. Floris National ParkRelated: Local participation can help align livelihoods with the park’s protection.

• Philippine eagleRelated: Local participation can reduce threats and support forest protection near eagle territories.

• Sian Kaʼan Biosphere ReserveRelated: Local participation connects habitat protection with livelihoods in and around Sian Kaʼan.