Linked from

The 124 pages that link to Comparative method, each with the reason it gives.

• EthnologyRelated: It turns separate cultural accounts into evidence about broader social patterns.

• Evolution of languagesRelated: Regular correspondences distinguish inherited similarities from chance resemblance or borrowing.

• Indo-European sound lawsRelated: It uses sound laws to infer unattested forms shared by Indo-European languages.

• Proto-Indo-European phonologyRelated: It supplies the core procedure for reconstructing Proto-Indo-European phonemes.

• Sound correspondenceRelated: It uses recurring sound correspondences to infer ancestral forms and establish language relationships.

• Cushitic languagesRelated: It underpins the reconstruction of Proto-Cushitic and Cushitic subgrouping.

• Neogrammarian hypothesisRelated: Regular sound correspondences provide its central evidence for reconstructing ancestors.

• Phonological changeRelated: Regular sound correspondences let linguists infer changes in unattested ancestral languages.

• Proto-Indo-European homelandRelated: It supplies the evidence for reconstructing Proto-Indo-European vocabulary and sound patterns.

• Anatolian languagesRelated: It establishes which Anatolian forms are inherited from earlier Indo-European.

• Phonemic mergerRelated: Regular merger patterns help explain why related languages lack certain sound distinctions.

• Great Lakes Bantu languagesRelated: It supports hypotheses about shared ancestry and sound changes among Great Lakes languages.

• Oceanic languagesRelated: It underlies the reconstruction of Proto-Oceanic from its descendants.

• PrimatologyRelated: Cross-species comparisons help distinguish shared ancestry from adaptation and behavioral flexibility.

• Carl RitterRelated: Ritter used comparison to relate the character of regions to human history.

• Iroquoian languagesRelated: It provides the standard means of establishing relationships within the family.

• Kartvelian languagesRelated: Kartvelian reconstruction relies on recurring correspondences rather than isolated word resemblances.

• Language divergenceRelated: Regular correspondences reveal which differences arose after the languages began diverging.

• Micronesian languagesRelated: Linguists use it to infer ancestral forms shared across Micronesian languages.

• NeuroethologyRelated: Comparisons reveal how neural solutions vary with animals’ sensory worlds and behaviors.

• Oto-Manguean languagesRelated: It supports the classification of Oto-Manguean languages as a family.

• Proto-Polynesian languageRelated: Regular sound correspondences among Polynesian languages support reconstruction of Proto-Polynesian forms.

• Slavic first palatalizationRelated: Regular sibilant correspondences support reconstruction of earlier Proto-Slavic velars.

• Slavic second palatalizationRelated: It helps infer Proto-Slavic consonants and the changes that produced their descendants.

• Tungusic languagesRelated: It establishes shared inheritance behind similarities among Tungusic languages.

• Unilineal evolutionRelated: Evolutionists used cross-cultural comparisons to place societies within proposed stages.

• Chadic languagesRelated: It underlies proposed reconstructions of Proto-Chadic and relationships among its branches.

• Kra–Dai languagesRelated: Regular sound correspondences, not resemblance alone, support the family’s historical classification.

• Nilotic languagesRelated: It provides the main evidence for grouping Nilotic languages and reconstructing Proto-Nilotic.

• Trans–New Guinea languagesRelated: Regular correspondences, rather than resemblance alone, are needed to establish deep relationships.

• East Asian studiesRelated: Lets scholars test regional generalizations against differences among East Asian societies.

• Karl LachmannRelated: Its comparative reasoning informed Lachmann’s work on Germanic languages.

• MonophthongizationRelated: Regular monophthongization can help explain why related languages have different vowel reflexes.

• Roberto LonghiRelated: Longhi compared paintings across regions and periods to expose artistic relationships and distinctions.

• Slavic third palatalizationRelated: It helps infer the unattested Proto-Slavic forms behind later Slavic words.

• The Rules of Sociological MethodRelated: Durkheim presents comparison as sociology’s way to test causal explanations.

• Alfred Radcliffe-BrownRelated: Comparison let him seek general principles across different societies.

• Algic languagesRelated: Regular sound correspondences support the proposed relationship among Algonquian, Wiyot, and Yurok.

• Brugmann's lawRelated: The law was proposed from recurring correspondences in Indo-Iranian and related evidence.

• Evolutionary linguisticsRelated: It distinguishes inherited similarities from coincidence or borrowing.

• Lyle CampbellRelated: Campbell uses its principles to assess proposed language relationships.

• Proto-Indo-European mythologyRelated: Its sound correspondences help establish inherited divine names and religious vocabulary.

• Wackernagel's lawRelated: Comparative evidence made it possible to recognize recurring clitic placement across languages.

• Alexander VovinRelated: It provides tools for testing claims about Japonic origins and historical relationships.

• Hirt's lawRelated: Comparative evidence is needed to infer the inherited accent and its retraction.

• Irawati KarveRelated: Karve compared regions and communities rather than treating India as socially uniform.

• Luba-KatangaRelated: It underlies the evidence used to classify Kiluba within the Bantu family.

• Monophthongization of diphthongs in Proto-SlavicRelated: Regular correspondences among Slavic languages support the reconstructed diphthongs and their outcomes.

• Osthoff's lawRelated: Comparative evidence established the historical patterns underlying the law.

• Phonological history of EnglishRelated: Cognate sound correspondences help reconstruct English’s unattested ancestors.