Linked from

The 62 pages that link to Corporate social responsibility, each with the reason it gives.

• Corporate governanceRelated: CSR describes commitments that governance structures can oversee and enforce.

• Moral responsibilityBroader topic: Corporate conduct raises the practical question of whether institutions can bear moral obligations.

• PhilanthropyCompared with: Corporate responsibility concerns a firm's conduct; philanthropy is its voluntary allocation of resources for public benefit.

• GreenwashingRelated: Greenwashing can substitute public-facing responsibility claims for substantive changes in corporate conduct.

• Fiduciary dutyRelated: Debates over corporate purpose ask whose interests directors may or must serve.

• BoycottRelated: Boycott pressure can prompt firms to change policies or disclose their practices.

• Labor rightsCompared with: Voluntary commitments differ from enforceable worker rights and legal duties.

• Stakeholder theoryRelated: It overlaps with stakeholder theory in assigning companies duties beyond owners.

• Board of directorsRelated: Boards influence whether these concerns are integrated into strategy and accountability.

• Fair tradeCompared with: Company-led responsibility differs from fair trade’s focus on trading relationships and producer terms.

• Mine tailingsRelated: Accountability for tailings risks raises questions about disclosure, liability, and community participation.

• Collective responsibilityBroader topic: It applies collective duties to companies whose decisions affect workers, communities, and ecosystems.

• CorporationRelated: Separate corporate decision-making has prompted debate about responsibilities beyond shareholders.

• Shareholder primacyCompared with: It challenges the claim that shareholder returns should determine corporate priorities.

• SportswashingCompared with: The distinction between substantive responsibility and image management is central to evaluating sportswashing claims.

• Nike, Inc.Related: Nike's labor controversies became a prominent test of corporate accountability.

• Profit maximizationCompared with: Such policies can impose costs or create benefits not captured by a narrow profit objective.

• ResponsibilityBroader topic: It extends answerability from individual decisions to organizational impacts.

• ProfitCompared with: It asks firms to consider consequences beyond financial profit.

• Shareholder valueCompared with: It asks companies to account for responsibilities that may not immediately raise equity value.

• Corporate identityRelated: Public identity can communicate commitments, whose credibility depends on organizational conduct.

• Corporate philanthropyNarrower topic: Philanthropy is one voluntary channel through which companies pursue social responsibility.

• IG FarbenCompared with: It offers a modern ethical framework against which IG Farben’s conduct and later accountability are often assessed.

• Living wageRelated: Employers may adopt living wage commitments as part of their labor responsibilities.

• Multinational corporationRelated: The geographic reach of multinationals raises questions about responsibility across their operations and suppliers.

• SweatshopRelated: Brands use policies and audits to address labor conditions among their suppliers.

• Corporate accountabilityCompared with: It often relies on voluntary commitments, unlike accountability mechanisms that can impose consequences.

• Ethical egoismRelated: It tests whether an organization’s duties extend beyond its own financial interests.

• PhilanthrocapitalismRelated: It connects corporate management ideas to the philanthropic approach’s emphasis on private-sector methods.

• Corporate personhoodRelated: It addresses duties corporations may have beyond the legal responsibilities attached to entity status.

• Ken Saro-WiwaNarrower topic: The controversy raised enduring questions about company conduct in regions where governments repress protest.

• Engineering ethicsCompared with: It addresses organizational conduct, while engineering ethics also governs individual professional judgment.

• Non-governmental organizationCompared with: It pursues public-interest aims within a business, rather than through an independent NGO.

• Strategic communicationRelated: Communication about responsibility invites scrutiny of whether organizational practices match stated commitments.

• Business administrationRelated: Administrative systems determine whether responsibilities become measurable organizational practices.

• Phil KnightNarrower topic: Nike’s labor controversies made responsibility a central test of Knight’s corporate legacy.

• Target CorporationRelated: Target’s public commitments and business decisions are judged against these responsibilities.

• UnileverNarrower topic: Unilever’s public commitments and brand policies are frequently discussed through this framework.

• Jamsetji TataRelated: The Tata tradition links business ownership with sustained support for social institutions.

• Stakeholder (organization or project)Related: Stakeholder concerns often guide how firms define social responsibilities.

• Frits PhilipsRelated: His wartime conduct raises questions about corporate responsibility under coercive rule.

• Indra NooyiNarrower topic: Performance with Purpose placed Nooyi’s agenda within a wider debate about corporate obligations.

• Mission statementRelated: Mission claims can set expectations for how an organization addresses its wider impacts.

• Ren ZhengfeiRelated: Ren’s public statements about Huawei’s responsibilities can be weighed against scrutiny of its conduct and governance.

• Alter-globalizationRelated: Campaign pressure helped make corporate conduct a more visible subject of public scrutiny.

• Business schoolRelated: Its place in curricula reflects debates about business responsibilities beyond profit.

• Carl IcahnCompared with: Activist demands can prioritize shareholder payouts over broader stakeholder commitments.

• GlencoreRelated: Glencore’s operations raise questions about how a multinational manages social and environmental impacts.

• Johnson & JohnsonNarrower topic: The company’s safety controversies test its public commitments to patients and consumers.

• Liliane BettencourtNarrower topic: Her fortune’s public reputation was tied to questions about corporate and private philanthropy.