Linked from

The 273 pages that link to Cultural appropriation, each with the reason it gives.

• BunyipCompared with: Popular retellings can detach the bunyip from Aboriginal knowledge and turn it into a generic monster.

• DabkeCompared with: Debates over who presents dabke and how it is credited shape some performances.

• Youth subcultureCompared with: Commercial adoption can detach subcultural styles from the communities that created them.

• Canadian cuisineCompared with: Debates over representation and benefit arise when Indigenous foods are commercialized or detached from their communities.

• Betty BoopCompared with: Debates about Betty’s origins include the influence of Black performers on her voice and style.

• Colonial architectureCompared with: The label raises questions about who controls local forms incorporated into colonial design.

• Cultural transferCompared with: It highlights disputes over ownership, power, and unequal exchange within cultural movement.

• Cusco SchoolCompared with: The paintings’ blended imagery raises questions about power, authorship, and cultural interpretation.

• David GulpililCompared with: Debates about who controls Indigenous stories frame the significance of Gulpilil’s cultural authority on screen.

• Jonathan LethemCompared with: Debates around borrowing and cultural ownership frame Lethem’s defense of creative reuse.

• ShchedrykCompared with: The English adaptation’s fame raises questions about recognition of the Ukrainian source.

• Slavic Native FaithCompared with: Debates over who may practice or reinterpret Slavic traditions raise questions of belonging and cultural authority.

• Taika WaititiCompared with: Debates about Indigenous representation and authorship frame assessments of some projects associated with Waititi.

• Angel De CoraCompared with: Her insistence on Native authorship contrasts with outsider control over Indigenous imagery.

• BeadworkCompared with: Commercial use of culturally specific beadwork raises questions of credit, access, and ownership.

• Creative economyCompared with: Commercial use of cultural knowledge raises questions about consent, credit, and fair compensation.

• Culture of South AfricaCompared with: Disputes over borrowed symbols and traditions expose tensions around ownership and inequality.

• Esther MahlanguCompared with: Her work prompts debate about who may adapt Ndebele designs and how their origins should be recognized.

• EthnofuturismCompared with: It sharpens questions about who may adapt traditions and how those adaptations are situated.

• Fleur-de-lisCompared with: Modern uses can detach the emblem from its French and royal histories or make those histories contested.

• Ivan MeštrovićCompared with: Debates about national ownership and representation complicate the later interpretation of his South Slavic subjects.

• J. M. G. Le ClézioCompared with: His portrayals of Indigenous and colonized worlds invite debate about representation and cultural authority.

• Jaafar JacksonCompared with: The concept contrasts with a family member portraying his own relative and cultural inheritance.

• Joaquín CortésCompared with: Debates about staging and marketing flamenco raise questions about who represents a cultural tradition.

• Madhubani artCompared with: Commercial use of Madhubani designs raises questions about attribution, control, and benefit for source communities.

• Maria MartinezCompared with: Her public fame invites questions about how Pueblo designs are represented and commercialized.

• Rama DuwajiCompared with: Her work raises questions about authorship and cultural authority in representing Arab subjects.

• Russell PetersCompared with: Debates about who may perform cultural caricatures provide a critical counterpoint to Peters’s use of them.

• Vasyl AvramenkoCompared with: The concept helps frame debates over who may adapt folk material and how staged versions represent its source communities.

• Visual arts of the Indigenous peoples of the AmericasCompared with: It clarifies disputes over who may use Indigenous designs and sacred imagery.

• Yoshiko YamaguchiCompared with: Her Chinese persona raises questions about performance, representation, and Japan’s colonial power in Manchuria.