Linked from

The 53 pages that link to Diglossia, each with the reason it gives.

• Language shiftRelated: Unequal use across formal and familiar settings can precede a broader shift.

• Language policyRelated: Policy may reinforce or alter the division between formal and everyday varieties.

• Arabic languageRelated: Arabic often pairs formal written varieties with regionally distinct everyday speech.

• Language standardizationRelated: A standard variety may occupy formal domains while local varieties remain common in daily life.

• Greek languageRelated: Modern Greece's Katharevousa–Demotic divide shaped language use and policy for generations.

• Arabic literatureRelated: The relationship between literary Arabic and spoken dialects shapes questions of audience and style.

• Old Church SlavonicRelated: Church Slavonic later functioned alongside vernacular Slavic speech as a learned liturgical language.

• Catalan languageRelated: Catalan-speaking communities have experienced changing divisions of use between Catalan and Spanish.

• ArabicRelated: Formal Arabic and local spoken varieties often serve different roles in the same society.

• Chinese languageRelated: Classical and vernacular Chinese long occupied different roles in writing and public life.

• Malay languageRelated: Formal standards and local Malay varieties can occupy different settings in everyday life.

• Egyptian ArabicRelated: Egyptians commonly use colloquial speech alongside formal Arabic in writing and public communication.

• Standard languageRelated: A standard may occupy formal domains while other varieties dominate everyday interaction.

• Vernacular literatureRelated: Diglossia explains how everyday speech and a prestigious literary language can coexist.

• Linguistic imperialismRelated: Functional separation can assign prestige and formal authority unevenly across varieties.

• Vulgar LatinRelated: The contrast between learned written Latin and local speech resembles a long-running division of functions.

• Register (sociolinguistics)Related: Diglossic communities allocate varieties to contexts in ways that resemble register differentiation.

• Vernacular ChineseRelated: The classical-to-vernacular transition changed the division between prestigious writing and everyday speech.

• ArabizationRelated: Arabic communities often use local spoken varieties alongside formal Modern Standard Arabic.

• Classical ArabicRelated: The concept frames the long-standing division between formal Arabic and everyday speech.

• Old FrenchRelated: Latin and vernacular speech occupied different roles in much medieval writing.

• Wu ChineseRelated: Wu speakers often navigate local speech alongside standardized Mandarin.

• Norwegian language conflictRelated: The gap between Norwegian speech and Danish-based writing resembles a divided linguistic repertoire.

• Arabic dialectsRelated: Arabic speakers commonly use dialects in conversation and formal Arabic in writing and public settings.

• Linguistic purismRelated: Greek purism developed amid a lasting divide between learned and vernacular forms.

• Algerian ArabicRelated: Formal Arabic and everyday Algerian Arabic often occupy different social settings.

• Faroese languageRelated: The historical division between Faroese and Danish illustrates how language roles can differ by setting.

• Levantine ArabicRelated: Many Arabic speakers use local Levantine varieties in conversation and Modern Standard Arabic in formal settings.

• Russian literary languageRelated: The historical division between Church Slavonic and vernacular Russian offers a related case of functional separation.

• PersianizationRelated: Persian could serve as an elite literary or administrative language beside local spoken languages.

• Standard GermanRelated: The relationship between Swiss German speech and standard writing is often analyzed through this concept.

• German dialectsRelated: Some German-speaking communities divide everyday dialect use from formal standard-language use.

• KatharevousaRelated: Greek institutions often assigned Katharevousa formal roles and demotic everyday ones.

• Tajik languageRelated: Formal written norms and everyday speech can differ across Tajik-speaking communities.

• Swiss GermanRelated: Swiss German speech and Standard German writing form a well-known functional division.

• Bihari languagesRelated: Bihari speakers may use local languages at home and Hindi in schooling or administration.

• Madurese languageRelated: Madurese speakers commonly use it alongside Indonesian, with choices shaped by setting and audience.

• Bambara languageRelated: Bambara coexists with French and other languages across settings with different expectations.

• DhivehiRelated: Formal and colloquial Dhivehi can differ in ways relevant to public and everyday use.

• Mendele Mocher SforimRelated: The differing status of Hebrew and Yiddish shaped his choices of audience and literary form.

• Romanization of ArabicRelated: Arabic pronunciation varies between Modern Standard Arabic and regional dialects, affecting transcription choices.

• Sinhala languageRelated: The gap between written and spoken Sinhala illustrates this linguistic pattern.

• CorsicanRelated: Corsican and French often occupy unequal roles in public and private life.

• LimburgishRelated: Speakers may use Limburgish locally and a national standard in formal settings.

• Walloon languageRelated: French often held formal domains while Walloon remained associated with local and informal speech.