Linked from
The 203 pages that link to Environmental justice, each with the reason it gives.
Sacred grovesRelated: Conservation policies can conflict with communities' authority over sacred forests.
Air quality indexRelated: Monitoring gaps and unequal exposure can limit whose air quality an index represents.
Anti-poachingRelated: Justice concerns test whether anti-poaching enforcement respects the rights of affected communities.
Community gardenRelated: Garden access and environmental benefits often reflect wider inequalities in land and resources.
Garbage collectionRelated: Collection coverage and the siting of transfer or disposal facilities can distribute benefits and harms unevenly.
Indigenous rightsRelated: Resource extraction and environmental harm often affect Indigenous lands and communities disproportionately.
Municipal solid wasteRelated: Waste facilities can concentrate pollution and traffic burdens in nearby communities.
Street treeRelated: Unequal tree canopy can mirror wider disparities in neighborhood resources and heat exposure.
Suburbanization in the United StatesRelated: Suburban development patterns distributed pollution, infrastructure, and environmental burdens unevenly.
Community-based participatory researchRelated: Partnerships can document local exposures while supporting community influence over environmental decisions.
Mountaintop removal miningRelated: Debates focus on how mining’s health and environmental burdens are distributed among communities.
Multinational corporationRelated: The siting of multinational operations can distribute pollution and risk unevenly across communities.
Polluter pays principleRelated: Cost allocation can conflict with justice when polluters pass charges to affected communities or consumers.
SuperfundRelated: Site selection, exposure, and cleanup burdens raise questions central to environmental justice.
Transportation planningRelated: Transport projects can concentrate pollution, displacement, or benefits in particular communities.
Corporate accountabilityRelated: Corporate harms often fall unevenly, making accountability a question of whose interests receive protection.
Drinking water qualityRelated: Water risks and access to remedies can fall disproportionately on marginalized communities.
EcofeminismRelated: It offers tools for analyzing how ecological burdens fall unevenly across gender, race, and class.
Environmental governanceRelated: It evaluates who bears costs and who has influence in governance.
Environmental policyRelated: Environmental policy determines who bears pollution and who influences decisions.
Groundwater remediationRelated: Contaminated groundwater burdens and cleanup resources can be distributed inequitably.
IncinerationRelated: Facility siting raises questions about who bears pollution risks and who receives energy or jobs.
Intensive animal farmingRelated: Communities near livestock facilities raise questions about pollution burdens and political voice.
Nature conservationRelated: Justice questions arise when conservation costs or access restrictions fall unevenly.
Ogoni peopleRelated: Ogoni activism links pollution, political voice, and unequal distribution of oil's costs.
Resource depletionRelated: The harms and benefits of depletion often fall on different communities.
Air pollution controlRelated: Control decisions shape pollution exposure, which often differs across communities.
Energy justiceNarrower topic: Energy justice extends environmental justice to energy access, infrastructure, and transition choices.
Environmental designRelated: It asks who benefits from environmental improvements and who bears their costs.
EquityRelated: It addresses unequal exposure to environmental harms and unequal influence over decisions.
Green New DealRelated: The framework links pollution reduction to unequal exposure and access to decision-making.
Ken Saro-WiwaNarrower topic: Saro-Wiwa connected pollution in Ogoniland to political exclusion and unequal control of resources.
Pollution preventionRelated: Preventing pollution can reduce disproportionate exposure in communities near industrial sources.
Public worksRelated: Infrastructure routes and burdens can expose some communities to disproportionate harm.
Resource extractionRelated: Extraction burdens often fall on communities with limited power over projects.
United States Environmental Protection AgencyRelated: The EPA applies this principle when assessing unequal exposure to pollution and access to protection.
Groundwater arsenic contaminationRelated: Contamination burdens often fall on communities with fewer resources for testing and safe alternatives.
Wangarĩ MaathaiRelated: Her campaigns connected ecological protection with people’s rights and access to resources.
Built environmentRelated: Infrastructure and land-use decisions can concentrate environmental burdens in some communities.
Environmental humanitiesRelated: It joins environmental questions to histories of race, class, and political exclusion.
Great AccelerationRelated: The benefits and harms of accelerating production and consumption are unequally distributed.
Human impact on the environmentRelated: Environmental burdens and benefits are distributed unevenly across communities.
Natural resourceRelated: Communities often bear unequal pollution and displacement from resource development.
Ocean conservationRelated: Conservation measures affect coastal communities and raise questions of access and fairness.
SustainabilityRelated: Sustainability goals can fail when harms and protections are distributed inequitably.
Tongass National ForestRelated: Forest decisions distribute economic benefits and ecological costs among communities.
Transit equityNarrower topic: Transit equity overlaps with who receives mobility benefits and who faces pollution, noise, and construction impacts.
Urban parkRelated: Unequal park access makes green space a question of neighborhood equity.
W. Eugene SmithRelated: The Minamata photographs centered those who bore the consequences of industrial pollution.
Coastal urbanizationRelated: Coastal development and hazard protection can distribute risks and benefits unequally.