Linked from

The 21 pages that link to Epistemic injustice, each with the reason it gives.

• PostcolonialismRelated: Postcolonial critiques trace how colonial hierarchies discredit local knowledge and testimony.

• Burden of proofRelated: Unequal credibility judgments can distort who is expected to prove a claim.

• Indigenous knowledgeRelated: It helps explain how Indigenous expertise can be dismissed within dominant institutions.

• RepresentationRelated: Misrepresentation can discredit testimony or obscure the concepts needed to express experience.

• Public understanding of scienceRelated: It highlights unequal authority in public exchanges about scientific knowledge.

• Evidence-based policyRelated: Decisions about admissible evidence can marginalize communities whose knowledge is less institutionally recognized.

• KnowledgeRelated: It raises questions about whose knowledge receives credibility and whose is excluded.

• Demarcation problemRelated: Boundary judgments can exclude people or evidence through biases as well as methodological standards.

• Situated knowledgeRelated: Power determines whose situated knowledge is heard, trusted, or excluded.

• Postcolonial feminismRelated: Colonial and gender hierarchies can discredit some people as knowers.

• GaslightingRelated: Gaslighting attacks a person’s standing as a reliable witness to their own experience.

• Social EpistemologyRelated: It reveals how social power can distort who is heard and understood.

• Boundary WorkRelated: Boundaries around legitimate expertise can silence some speakers and privilege others.

• Sociology of knowledgeRelated: It identifies how social prejudice can distort whose testimony is believed.

• IndoctrinationRelated: Indoctrinative systems may discredit sources that could challenge their doctrines.

• Patricia Hill CollinsRelated: Collins's account of whose knowledge counts illuminates how power produces unequal credibility and understanding.

• AgnotologyRelated: Ignorance can be sustained by excluding some people from producing or validating knowledge.

• Contemporary philosophyRelated: It asks how social power shapes whose knowledge counts in public and intellectual life.

• Martha Mitchell effectRelated: Misclassifying a truthful witness’s account can deprive them of credibility as a knower.

• ObscurantismRelated: Obscurantist restrictions can deny groups both credibility and access to shared knowledge.