Linked from

The 183 pages that link to Evidence-based medicine, each with the reason it gives.

• FomiteRelated: Fomite precautions should reflect evidence of transmission rather than surface detection alone.

• Special libraryRelated: Medical and other professional libraries help practitioners find evidence for informed decisions.

• Biomedical researchRelated: It is one route by which research findings inform care.

• Compression garmentRelated: Clinical recommendations depend on evidence for specific garments, conditions, and pressure levels.

• Medical nutrition therapyRelated: Nutrition recommendations should reflect evidence alongside individual circumstances.

• Nutritional scienceRelated: Its evidence standards offer a framework for evaluating nutrition interventions.

• Preventive healthcareRelated: Preventive recommendations rely on evidence about benefits, harms, and uncertainty.

• Acupuncture pointRelated: It evaluates claims about specific points against controlled clinical evidence.

• Clinical pharmacologyRelated: Its methods help translate pharmacological evidence into choices for individual care.

• James BlackRelated: Black’s medicines became major therapies whose benefits and risks were evaluated in clinical trials.

• Mental health professionalRelated: Practitioners must adapt evidence to individuals rather than apply protocols mechanically.

• Sports scienceRelated: It frames how sports science findings should inform coaching and care.

• BibliotherapyRelated: It provides a framework for judging which books and methods are suitable for particular problems.

• Counseling psychologyRelated: It frames how counseling psychologists select and evaluate interventions.

• Martin SeligmanRelated: Evaluating Seligman-inspired interventions requires evidence about their effects, limits, and appropriate use.

• Medical testRelated: Test results contribute evidence but must be interpreted alongside clinical context and preferences.

• Applied psychologyRelated: It guides applied decisions beyond relying on theory or intuition alone.

• Self-help bookRelated: It provides a standard for judging whether a book's methods rest on reliable evidence.

• WHO Model List of Essential MedicinesRelated: Evidence on efficacy and safety informs decisions about which medicines belong on the list.

• Apple cider vinegarRelated: It helps evaluate health claims about apple cider vinegar against clinical evidence.

• Crystal healingRelated: Its standards distinguish supported treatments from crystal healing claims.

• Dependent personality disorderRelated: Limited disorder-specific treatment research leaves clinicians combining broader evidence with individual needs.

• MedicationRelated: It provides a framework for judging whether medication benefits justify risks.

• Oppositional defiant disorderRelated: Treatment studies assess which interventions work best for different children and families.

• PsychotherapistRelated: It guides psychotherapists in choosing and adapting treatments.

• TherapeuticsRelated: It provides a framework for choosing among treatment options.

• Marsha M. LinehanRelated: DBT’s dissemination reflects Linehan’s emphasis on testing treatment through systematic research.

• Medical doctorRelated: It helps doctors choose treatments using more than custom or personal experience.

• Medical procedureRelated: Evidence helps determine whether a procedure's benefits justify its risks.

• Medical scienceRelated: It provides a framework for applying research findings to care.

• Paranoid personality disorderRelated: Research on disorder-specific treatment remains less developed than for many other diagnoses.

• Psychological researchRelated: It translates psychological findings into choices about care.

• PsychologistRelated: It sets a standard for choosing psychological interventions beyond habit or intuition.

• ScientismRelated: Its model combines scientific findings with judgment and values rather than treating data as sufficient.

• Trigger pointRelated: It provides a framework for judging claims about trigger-point diagnosis and treatment.

• Anesthesia and AnalgesiaRelated: Published findings contribute to evidence-informed clinical practice.

• AutophobiaRelated: Treatment evidence specific to autophobia is limited, so clinicians draw on research about related conditions.

• Body integrity dysphoriaRelated: Limited controlled research leaves clinicians with substantial uncertainty about effective care.

• Caldwell EsselstynRelated: Its standards frame evaluation of the clinical evidence behind Esselstyn’s recommendations.

• Clinical neuroscienceRelated: It helps translate neuroscience findings into responsible treatment decisions.

• Counseling interventionRelated: It frames how research and client circumstances inform intervention selection.

• Craniosacral therapyRelated: Its standards help distinguish evidence for symptom relief from claims about mechanism.

• Elizabeth KennyRelated: The dispute over Kenny’s claims highlights the need to test treatments systematically.

• Folie à deuxRelated: Sparse comparative research makes treatment choices especially dependent on limited evidence.

• HijamaRelated: It offers a framework for judging hijama’s claims against clinical evidence and treatment risks.

• Literature (scholarly publications)Related: Clinical decisions draw on literature assessed for relevance and reliability.

• Maladaptive daydreamingRelated: Dedicated treatment recommendations require stronger studies than are currently available.

• MorgellonsRelated: The dispute tests how clinicians balance limited evidence with persistent symptoms and patient accounts.

• Nigella sativaRelated: It provides a framework for judging claims about Nigella preparations against controlled human evidence.

• Ocimum tenuiflorumRelated: It offers a framework for assessing claims about tulsi without dismissing traditional practice.