Linked from

The 102 pages that link to Historical method, each with the reason it gives.

• Source criticismNarrower topic: Source criticism supplies a core set of tests within historical research.

• Historical source criticismNarrower topic: Source criticism is one part of the broader process of historical inquiry.

• Social historyNarrower topic: Social history relies on source criticism and comparison to make claims about past societies.

• ThucydidesNarrower topic: Thucydides’ scrutiny of testimony became an early model of disciplined historical inquiry.

• Historical JesusNarrower topic: Historical Jesus research depends on assessing ancient sources rather than treating them as transparent records.

• Archival researchNarrower topic: Historical method supplies core practices for evaluating archival evidence.

• Historical sourceNarrower topic: Source analysis is one stage in the broader process of historical inquiry.

• Medieval historiographyNarrower topic: Modern interpretation tests medieval claims against source context and corroborating evidence.

• Historical accuracyNarrower topic: Its procedures connect source evaluation with defensible historical interpretation.

• Historical contextNarrower topic: It supplies the procedures for assembling and testing contextual claims.

• Leopold von RankeNarrower topic: Ranke’s source-based practice became a model within the broader discipline of historical inquiry.

• Marc BlochNarrower topic: Bloch made explicit how historians should question evidence and construct explanations.

• EuhemerismNarrower topic: Euhemerism resembles historical reconstruction, but often lacks the evidence needed to verify its claims.

• Historical evidenceNarrower topic: Historical evidence gains force through systematic investigation rather than mere accumulation.

• DiplomaticsNarrower topic: Diplomatics supplies specialized tests of documentary evidence within broader historical inquiry.

• Early Islamic historiographyNarrower topic: Debates over early Islamic sources exemplify broader questions about evidence, inference, and uncertainty.

• Spring and Autumn AnnalsNarrower topic: The chronicle’s selective notices require careful separation of recorded fact from later interpretation.

• Erwin PanofskyNarrower topic: His approach made historical context a structured part of art interpretation.

• Popular historyNarrower topic: Popular accounts adapt findings produced through historians’ research methods.

• PseudohistoryNarrower topic: Its standards distinguish evidence-based historical work from pseudohistorical claims.

• American historiographyNarrower topic: Historiography evaluates the methods historians use to construct accounts of the United States.

• Benny MorrisNarrower topic: Morris’s contested interpretations illustrate how archival evidence is weighed against competing explanations.

• ClassicsNarrower topic: Classical claims depend on weighing literary, documentary, archaeological, and scientific evidence.

• Contemporary historyNarrower topic: It helps distinguish corroborated findings from claims based on incomplete recent records.

• David IrvingNarrower topic: The court evaluated whether Irving handled sources according to sound historical practice.

• EthnohistoryNarrower topic: Ethnohistory adapts historical methods while drawing on additional disciplines.

• Henry AdamsNarrower topic: Adams’s documentary research helped establish a model for rigorous American political history.

• The Daughter of TimeNarrower topic: Grant applies source criticism to challenge a familiar account of the princes’ fate.

• Ancient historyNarrower topic: It explains how historians assess reliability, context, and gaps in ancient records.

• Arthur M. Schlesinger Sr.Narrower topic: His interpretive books and teaching shaped how students approached historical evidence.

• Christ myth theoryNarrower topic: Both mythicist and historicist arguments depend on how evidence is evaluated.

• History of atheismNarrower topic: Sparse or hostile sources require careful distinctions between documented beliefs and later labels.

• Jared SparksNarrower topic: Sparks’s work illustrates how source selection and editorial judgment shape historical claims.

• KapilaNarrower topic: It separates evidence for Kapila from later traditional claims about his life.

• Numa Denis Fustel de CoulangesNarrower topic: His arguments show how written sources and close comparison can support broad claims about social change.

• Robert FogelNarrower topic: Debates over Fogel’s work raised questions about how quantitative models should be tested against historical sources.

• Auxiliary sciences of historyNarrower topic: Auxiliary disciplines supply specialized procedures within broader historical inquiry.

• Elizabeth BáthoryNarrower topic: Source criticism separates contemporary testimony from later embellishment in Báthory's story.

• Evidence and documentation for the HolocaustNarrower topic: Holocaust research applies historical methods to records produced by victims, perpetrators, and witnesses.

• François Victor Alphonse AulardNarrower topic: Aulard’s archival work exemplified professional methods applied to revolutionary history.

• James Anthony FroudeNarrower topic: Froude’s use of narrative and documentary evidence belongs to wider debates about historical writing.

• Mochizuki ChiyomeNarrower topic: It helps assess whether accounts of Chiyome rest on contemporary evidence.

• Parameswara of MalaccaNarrower topic: It helps distinguish documented events from details preserved mainly in later chronicles.

• Robert PaxtonNarrower topic: Paxton’s conclusions depended on testing retrospective claims against administrative records.

• Socrates of ConstantinopleNarrower topic: Socrates’s source choices and judgments can be examined through these practices.