Linked from
The 18 pages that link to Indigenous data sovereignty, each with the reason it gives.
Indigenous knowledgeRelated: Digital records can expose knowledge and communities to uses beyond their control.
Cultural heritage managementRelated: It raises questions about control of heritage records and culturally sensitive knowledge.
Decolonization of museumsRelated: It extends authority over collections to records, images, and knowledge derived from them.
Arctic researchRelated: Research partnerships must address who controls observations and how findings are shared and applied.
Indigenous archaeologyRelated: It makes the difference between consultation and control especially clear for archaeological records.
Indigenous rightsRelated: It applies collective authority to research, records, and digital information.
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation ActRelated: NAGPRA’s consultation and inventory rules intersect with Indigenous authority over cultural information.
Indigenous identityRelated: Data governance affects how identities are counted, represented, and used.
Daisy BatesRelated: It raises contemporary questions about access to and control over records Bates created.
Colonial scienceRelated: It addresses who controls data gathered within research systems shaped by colonial rule.
EthnobiologyRelated: It concerns community authority over records of knowledge gathered through ethnobiological research.
Fanny Cochrane SmithRelated: It frames debates over access and authority surrounding recordings made under colonial conditions.
Missing and Murdered Indigenous WomenRelated: Indigenous control of case data supports accurate records and community-directed policy.
Walter Baldwin SpencerRelated: It offers a contemporary framework for considering control over records created through Spencer’s fieldwork.
Digital reconstruction of cultural heritageRelated: Community authority matters when models represent Indigenous places, objects, or knowledge.
Mythologies of the Indigenous peoples of the AmericasRelated: Digitized recordings and texts raise questions of consent, custody, and community governance.
Napoleon ChagnonRelated: The debate over field records and blood samples underscores who should control knowledge about Yanomami communities.