Linked from

The 15 pages that link to Kellogg–Briand Pact, each with the reason it gives.

• Arms controlRelated: Its ambition to outlaw war contrasted with later efforts to manage armaments directly.

• Mukden IncidentRelated: The invasion tested the practical force of the pact’s prohibition on aggressive war.

• Crime against peaceRelated: Nuremberg prosecutors relied on the pact as evidence that aggressive war was unlawful.

• Locarno TreatiesRelated: It extended the interwar effort to limit war that Locarno had advanced regionally.

• War of aggressionRelated: The pact made renunciation of war a major pre-Charter legal commitment.

• Class A war crimesRelated: Prosecutors relied on the pact as evidence that aggressive war was already unlawful.

• Drago DoctrineRelated: Its broad renunciation of war later surpassed the doctrine’s narrower focus on debt collection.

• Jus ad bellumRelated: It marked a major pre-Charter attempt to outlaw war, despite weak enforcement.

• Austen ChamberlainRelated: It extended the era’s efforts to restrain war beyond Locarno’s regional border guarantees.

• Stimson DoctrineRelated: Stimson cited the pact as a basis for denying legitimacy to gains secured by force.

• Declaration of warRelated: Its renunciation of war weakened the idea that formal declarations alone could legitimize resort to force.

• Idealism in international relationsRelated: It illustrates the attempt to delegitimize war through international agreement, despite weak enforcement.

• Ben FerenczRelated: Its prohibition of war informed arguments that aggressive war could carry individual criminal responsibility.