Linked from

The 21 pages that link to Linguistic description, each with the reason it gives.

• Language standardizationCompared with: Description documents usage; standardization promotes particular norms.

• OrthographyCompared with: Description records writing practices, while orthographic rules may prescribe a preferred standard.

• PhilologyCompared with: It can study living speech without the historical documents central to philological work.

• Standard languageCompared with: Description distinguishes linguistic patterns from judgments that label standard forms as correct.

• Arabic grammarCompared with: It distinguishes observed Arabic usage from prescriptive grammatical rules.

• English grammarCompared with: It documents English grammar in use rather than enforcing a preferred standard.

• Prescriptive grammarCompared with: It documents the usage that prescriptive rules may accept, reject, or overlook.

• Grammar (linguistics)Compared with: It treats grammatical patterns as observed facts rather than rules for correct usage.

• LexicographyCompared with: Its descriptive stance contrasts with dictionaries that enforce preferred usage.

• Standard EnglishCompared with: It distinguishes describing standard usage from declaring other varieties defective.

• Copy editingCompared with: It documents usage patterns that editorial rules may accept, reject, or treat as changing.

• Language variationCompared with: It documents variation without treating nonstandard forms as linguistic failures.

• Royal Spanish AcademyCompared with: It contrasts with the Academy’s explicit role in recommending standard forms.

• Spelling reformCompared with: Reform prescribes changes, while descriptive work documents spelling practices and variation.

• Linguistic prescriptionCompared with: It records usage patterns rather than prescribing which forms speakers should use.

• History of linguisticsCompared with: Its aims distinguish modern linguistic inquiry from traditional rule-setting.