Linked from

The 17 pages that link to Minimum viable population, each with the reason it gives.

• Habitat fragmentationRelated: Small populations in fragments face elevated risks of extinction.

• Conservation biologyRelated: It gives conservation planning a population-level persistence target, though estimates depend on assumptions.

• Wildlife conservationRelated: It frames concerns about small populations, while depending on assumptions and local conditions.

• Wildlife managementRelated: Risk thresholds depend on uncertain demographic and environmental assumptions.

• Endangered speciesRelated: It links population size to long-term persistence, though no universal threshold exists.

• Population viability analysisRelated: This threshold translates a modeled persistence probability into a population-size target.

• Extinction debtRelated: Populations below this threshold may persist temporarily while remaining vulnerable to eventual extinction.

• Genetic rescueRelated: Genetic improvement alone may not ensure persistence if demographic risks remain high.

• Population bottleneckRelated: Bottleneck severity can affect whether a population remains viable through demographic and genetic risks.

• Extinction riskRelated: Small populations are more exposed to chance events that can increase risk.

• Reintroduction biologyRelated: Release targets often depend on the numbers needed to reduce extinction risk.

• Genetic loadRelated: Genetic load can reduce survival and reproduction, changing persistence estimates.

• Habitat destructionRelated: Habitat loss can shrink populations below levels that sustain long-term survival.

• Species extinctionRelated: It estimates how small a population can become before extinction risk becomes unacceptable.

• TranslocationRelated: A release may establish a population without making it large enough to persist.

• Philippine eagleRelated: The eagle’s low numbers raise questions about the scale of recovery needed for long-term persistence.