Linked from
The 110 pages that link to Oral history, each with the reason it gives.
Oral traditionCompared with: Unlike broad inherited tradition, oral history usually documents identifiable witnesses and experiences.
Historical revisionismRelated: Oral testimony has supplied evidence that can supplement or contest written archives.
Historical methodRelated: It extends historical evidence while raising questions about memory and retrospective narration.
Documentary filmRelated: Interviews preserve testimony while documentary images place individual memories in context.
Historical memoryRelated: Personal testimony carries remembered experience beyond written archives.
HistoriographyRelated: It raises questions about memory, voice, and evidence in historical accounts.
Source criticismRelated: Memory, interview conditions, and later interpretation affect how testimony should be evaluated.
AutobiographyCompared with: Oral history preserves life accounts through interviews rather than a self-authored written narrative.
Public historyRelated: Interviews bring first-person testimony into community projects and public interpretation.
TestimonyRelated: It preserves testimony as a source for understanding past events and ordinary lives.
Historical source criticismRelated: Memory, interview conditions, and later knowledge all affect how testimony can be used.
Social historyRelated: Interviews can preserve perspectives absent from written institutional records.
Material cultureCompared with: It preserves personal accounts that objects alone cannot supply.
Primary sourceRelated: Recorded testimony can preserve firsthand memories of an event.
Ibn BattutaRelated: Ibn Battuta’s account was dictated, making transmission and editorial mediation central to its form.
NarrativeRelated: Oral histories turn remembered experience into accounts shaped by speakers and interview contexts.
Archival researchRelated: Interview recordings and related papers can enter archives and complement documentary evidence.
InterviewRelated: Oral historians use interviews to preserve firsthand accounts and memories.
Qualitative researchRelated: Interviews preserve personal perspectives that complement documentary accounts of historical events.
Oral literatureCompared with: It overlaps with oral literature but chiefly documents testimony rather than crafted verbal art.
Historical sourceBroader topic: Recorded testimony can preserve experiences absent from institutional documents.
BiographyRelated: Interviews can add recollections, while requiring care about memory and perspective.
Field recordingRelated: Portable recording brings interviews into homes, workplaces, and historically significant places.
GriotsCompared with: Oral history commonly records individual testimony, while griots also transmit inherited narratives and genealogies.
Truth commissionRelated: Interviews preserve experiences that official archives may omit.
Ethiopian historiographyRelated: Its methods help preserve and assess oral testimony alongside written Ethiopian sources.
Lin BiaoRelated: Witness accounts and later testimony offer evidence beyond the official Chinese narrative.
Memory politicsCompared with: It gathers testimony, whereas memory politics concerns how such accounts gain or lose public standing.
Historical narrativeRelated: Oral testimony broadens narrative evidence while raising questions about memory and interpretation.
Memory studiesRelated: Interviews capture how people interpret events and transmit recollections beyond written records.
History of the familyRelated: Testimony can recover family experiences poorly represented in official archives.
Holocaust testimonyNarrower topic: Holocaust interviews use oral-history methods to capture personal accounts.
Women's historyRelated: Interviews preserve memories often absent from official records.
Alan LomaxRelated: Lomax’s conversations with musicians preserved their accounts alongside their performances.
Folklore studiesCompared with: It overlaps with folklore collection but emphasizes remembered experience and historical testimony.
Holocaust remembranceNarrower topic: Holocaust testimony is preserved and interpreted through oral-history methods.
Historical evidenceBroader topic: Recorded testimony preserves experiences often absent from written archives.
African historiographyRelated: Interviews and remembered experience complement written archives in African historical research.
National Recording RegistryRelated: Oral histories in the Registry preserve spoken testimony alongside music and broadcasts.
Vietnamese historiographyRelated: Interviews preserve memories that official documents often omit, especially of war and social change.
Crazy HorseRelated: Much knowledge about Crazy Horse comes through Lakota oral traditions rather than his own written record.
Historical anthropologyRelated: Interviews can preserve memories and perspectives that written archives exclude.
HistoryRelated: It can document experiences missing from written archives, while memory requires careful evaluation.
Indigenous archaeologyRelated: Oral accounts can contribute historical knowledge and guide archaeological interpretation.
TestimonioRelated: Both preserve lived accounts, though testimonio often makes an explicit political claim.
Colonial historiographyRelated: It can recover experiences and political meanings absent from colonial written records.
Field researchRelated: Interviews in people’s communities can connect individual memory with local context.
National Museum of African American History and CultureRelated: Recorded testimony preserves experiences that may be absent from official records.
Archival footageRelated: Testimony can supply context that archival images cannot show or establish.
Cultural heritage preservationRelated: Recorded testimony preserves knowledge that may not exist in written archives.