Linked from

The 24 pages that link to Planned obsolescence, each with the reason it gives.

• Mass productionRelated: Critics connect large production volumes with incentives to accelerate product replacement.

• ConsumerismRelated: It encourages repeat purchases by shortening products’ perceived or actual useful lives.

• Right to repairCompared with: Restricted repair can shorten product life, the outcome repair-right advocates seek to prevent.

• The CaveRelated: The Center’s demand for changing goods makes Cipriano’s durable pottery commercially unwanted.

• Electronic wasteRelated: Short product lifetimes can increase the volume of discarded electronics.

• Luxury goodsCompared with: Luxury positioning often depends on durability and repair, in tension with replacement-driven consumption.

• Consumer electronicsRelated: Upgrade cycles raise questions about repairability, software support, and product lifespan.

• Thorstein VeblenRelated: Veblen’s critique of business incentives anticipates concerns about production for sales rather than need.

• Consumer societyRelated: Shortened product lifetimes can sustain repeat purchasing.

• Alfred P. SloanRelated: GM’s yearly styling changes became closely associated with consumer demand for newer cars.

• Packaging designCompared with: Durable, reusable packaging challenges disposable systems built around repeated replacement.

• Retro styleCompared with: Retro products can resist disposable novelty by renewing interest in durable forms and older objects.

• Do it yourselfRelated: Repair-oriented DIY challenges replacement cycles encouraged by products that are hard to maintain.

• Disposable productRelated: It can create short lifetimes, though disposability may be intentional without planned failure.

• Sustainable designCompared with: It conflicts with designing for durability, repair, and reduced material throughput.

• FrugalityCompared with: Frugality's preference for lasting value conflicts with products designed for early replacement.

• Anti-consumerismRelated: It illustrates how business incentives can produce repeated purchasing and waste.

• IKEACompared with: IKEA’s affordability and product turnover invite debate about durability and replacement.

• King C. GilletteRelated: Frequent blade replacement made the Gillette system an early example of recurring consumption, though not necessarily planned obsolescence.

• Smart TVRelated: Software support can end while a smart TV’s display hardware still works.

• Consumer behaviourRelated: Replacement cycles connect purchasing patterns to product design and disposal.

• Diderot effectCompared with: It also fuels repeat buying, but through product replacement rather than coherence-seeking.

• ShoppingRelated: Replacement cycles can create recurring shopping demand for products that wear out or become outdated.

• Zero wasteCompared with: Short product lifetimes conflict with zero waste’s emphasis on durability and continued use.