Linked from

The 59 pages that link to Populism, each with the reason it gives.

• TechnocracyCompared with: Populist movements often challenge technocrats as an insulated governing elite.

• Democratic accountabilityCompared with: Claims to speak for the people can bypass institutions that make officials answerable.

• Democratic LegitimacyCompared with: Populist claims to embody the people can challenge pluralist and institutional accounts of legitimacy.

• Participatory democracyCompared with: Both invoke popular power, but populism need not build inclusive, sustained participation in institutions.

• Democratic deficitCompared with: Populist claims often present a democratic deficit as elite rule detached from popular will.

• CaudillismoCompared with: Some caudillos invoked popular support, but personal military authority defines caudillismo more directly.

• Political extremismCompared with: Populist rhetoric can be democratic or anti-democratic, so it is not synonymous with extremism.

• Mass lineCompared with: The mass line invokes popular knowledge without treating the party as merely an opponent of elites.

• David RockefellerCompared with: Rockefeller's prominence among wealthy business leaders made him a frequent target of anti-elite criticism.

• GlobalismCompared with: Populist movements often portray globalist institutions as distant and unaccountable.

• Rodrigo Borja CevallosCompared with: Populist movements competed for support with the party-based reformism Borja represented.

• Mob ruleCompared with: Populism claims popular legitimacy but does not necessarily entail rule by an unruly crowd.

• Radical centrismCompared with: Both can criticize established institutions, but populism centers a people-versus-elite divide.