Linked from

The 16 pages that link to Proto-Indo-European homeland, each with the reason it gives.

• Historical linguisticsRelated: Linguistic reconstruction constrains homeland proposals but does not settle their geography alone.

• Indo-European languagesRelated: Its location frames accounts of the family’s earliest expansion.

• Proto-Indo-European languageRelated: Locating the homeland connects linguistic reconstruction to migration and archaeological evidence.

• Proto-Indo-EuropeansRelated: Its location remains disputed despite linguistic, archaeological, and genetic research.

• Kurgan hypothesisRelated: The hypothesis locates this homeland on the Pontic-Caspian steppe.

• Indo-European studiesRelated: Linguistic reconstructions contribute evidence, but do not by themselves settle the homeland’s location.

• GlottochronologyRelated: Dating language splits has been used in arguments about when and where Indo-European spread.

• Indo-European linguisticsRelated: Its location is inferred by combining linguistic evidence with archaeological and genetic research.

• Linguistic paleontologyRelated: Reconstructed terms for flora, fauna, and terrain have been used to locate this homeland.

• Anatolian languagesRelated: Anatolian evidence is central to disputes over where and when the family began to disperse.

• Corded Ware cultureRelated: Corded Ware's steppe ancestry bears on, but cannot alone determine, homeland hypotheses.

• Steppe hypothesisRelated: The location of this homeland is the hypothesis's central claim.

• Colin RenfrewRelated: The location of this homeland is the central question separating Renfrew’s model from its rivals.

• Proto-Indo-European mythologyRelated: Competing homeland models affect claims about the environment and historical setting of myths.