Linked from

The 27 pages that link to Retributive justice, each with the reason it gives.

• Free willRelated: Its justification depends on whether agents can be responsible in a desert-based sense.

• Moral responsibilityRelated: Retributivism makes moral responsibility and desert central grounds for punishment.

• Criminal lawRelated: It justifies criminal penalties through deserved accountability for past offenses.

• Procedural justiceRelated: Punishment systems must address both fair procedures and the justification of sanctions.

• Capital punishmentRelated: It supplies a major justification for imposing death as deserved punishment.

• Moral judgmentRelated: It links judgments of blame to judgments about deserved punishment.

• Book of JobRelated: The friends rely on this principle, while Job’s case exposes its limits.

• ResponsibilityRelated: It links established responsibility to the claim that wrongdoers deserve punishment.

• Wisdom literatureRelated: Job challenges the assumption that suffering reliably signals wrongdoing.

• Divine justiceRelated: It clarifies the logic behind punishment as a deserved response to wrongdoing.

• Criminal justice systemRelated: Retribution is one rationale used to justify criminal penalties.

• Life imprisonmentRelated: It supplies a central rationale for imposing exceptionally long sentences.

• ImprisonmentRelated: It grounds imprisonment in deserved punishment rather than primarily in future benefits.

• Poetic justiceRelated: It provides a legal and ethical counterpart to punishment that fits a fictional offense.

• Soghomon TehlirianRelated: The case tests whether punishment can answer atrocities when their perpetrators evade ordinary prosecution.