Linked from

The 27 pages that link to Roman imperial succession, each with the reason it gives.

• Constantine the GreatRelated: Constantine’s rise depended on military acclamation and victory in civil war.

• Crisis of the Third CenturyRelated: The absence of a settled succession rule turned military loyalty into a recurring political contest.

• Praetorian GuardRelated: The Guard’s support could influence who claimed the throne.

• DiocletianRelated: The Tetrarchy aimed to replace unpredictable successions with planned transfers of power.

• Roman emperorRelated: No stable rule governed succession, repeatedly exposing the office to coups and civil wars.

• TetrarchyNarrower topic: The Tetrarchy’s planned transfers of office addressed Rome’s recurring succession crises.

• Septimius SeverusRelated: Severus’s dynastic succession plan passed power to two sons with incompatible ambitions.

• TiberiusRelated: Tiberius’s accession exposed the tension between dynastic inheritance and formal republican institutions.

• Theodosius IINarrower topic: Theodosius inherited the throne as a child, making regency and court support decisive.

• ClaudiusRelated: His accession and adoption of Nero shaped the dynasty’s contested transfer of power.

• Severan dynastyNarrower topic: The dynasty’s rise and fall depended on contested accessions rather than a fixed hereditary law.

• Year of the Four EmperorsNarrower topic: The crisis exposed the lack of a settled rule for choosing an emperor.

• Nerva–Antonine dynastyNarrower topic: The dynasty’s handovers were instances of Rome’s broader, often contested succession problem.

• Roman imperial propagandaRelated: Succession crises exposed how images and titles could support rival claims.

• Flavian dynastyRelated: The transfer from Vespasian to his sons tested dynastic succession.

• CaligulaNarrower topic: Caligula’s killing left no settled rule for choosing the next emperor.

• Year of the Five EmperorsNarrower topic: No settled hereditary rule or binding election process resolved the crisis.

• Julio-Claudian dynastyRelated: Adoption, marriage, kinship, and military backing shaped transitions between the dynasty’s rulers.

• Marcus Vipsanius AgrippaRelated: Agrippa’s marriages and descendants became central to Augustus’s early succession plans.

• Decius (Roman emperor)Related: Decius became emperor through army acclamation and victory rather than a settled hereditary succession.

• Philip the ArabNarrower topic: Philip’s accession illustrates how an emperor could emerge from military command rather than dynastic inheritance.

• GalbaRelated: Galba’s adoption of an heir and violent removal exposed succession’s lack of settled rules.

• Nerva (Roman emperor)Narrower topic: Nerva’s accession and choice of heir illustrate competing routes to imperial power.

• Severus AlexanderRelated: Alexander inherited power through dynastic adoption, but succession offered no secure protection against soldiers’ revolt.

• Battle of AbritusRelated: Decius and Herennius died without an orderly transfer, leaving the army to elevate a successor.

• Memoirs of HadrianRelated: Hadrian’s account of adoption and succession links personal choice to the empire’s future.

• Barracks emperorRelated: No settled succession rule left armies able to promote rival claimants.