Linked from

The 96 pages that link to Scholarly peer review, each with the reason it gives.

• Research assessmentRelated: Expert judgment is a central route for assessing research quality when metrics are insufficient.

• Learned societyRelated: Society journals commonly use peer review to assess submissions before publication.

• Scientific AmericanCompared with: Magazine articles explain research but are not themselves a substitute for peer-reviewed papers.

• Academic historyRelated: It is a central institutional check on historical scholarship.

• Henry OldenburgRelated: Oldenburg’s editorial scrutiny anticipated parts of journal review, though it was not modern formal peer review.

• Millennium Prize ProblemsRelated: The institute requires a solution to receive broad acceptance in the mathematics community.

• ScienceRelated: Expert scrutiny can identify weaknesses in methods, evidence, and interpretation.

• Science—The Endless FrontierRelated: Bush’s proposed funding system assigned scientific experts a role in judging research proposals.

• Academic conferenceRelated: Many conferences use it to select submissions for talks or proceedings.

• Academic integrityRelated: Confidentiality, impartiality, and disclosure of conflicts apply integrity principles to review.

• DoctorateRelated: External examination and publication can subject doctoral work to expert scrutiny.

• Medical Research CouncilRelated: Expert assessment helps the Council evaluate research proposals and award funding.

• PLOS ONERelated: External reviewers assess submissions for rigor and technical validity.

• Academic researchRelated: It subjects research claims and methods to scrutiny by other specialists.

• Benjamin SillimanCompared with: The journal’s early editorial practices predated modern peer-review systems.

• Michael E. MannNarrower topic: Disputes over Mann’s papers raised public questions about how peer review works.

• Scientific communityRelated: It subjects research claims and methods to scrutiny by other members of the community.

• ScientistRelated: Independent scrutiny can identify weaknesses in scientific methods and conclusions.

• The New England Journal of MedicineRelated: External expert assessment is one stage in evaluating submitted research.

• Harvard Law ReviewCompared with: Law reviews commonly rely on student editorial selection rather than conventional expert peer review.

• Journal des sçavansCompared with: The journal’s early editorial practice preceded the formalized peer-review systems now associated with academic journals.

• Research methodologyRelated: It scrutinizes whether a study's methods support its claims.

• Water memoryRelated: Publication of the contested study raised questions about what peer review can establish.

• Annalen der PhysikRelated: Its changing practices help explain how the journal selected scientific contributions.

• Astronomy & AstrophysicsRelated: Expert assessment is central to the journal's publication process.

• Fringe scienceRelated: Review can expose methodological weaknesses, though publication alone does not establish a claim's truth.

• Graduate studentRelated: Graduate researchers encounter peer review when submitting their work for publication.

• History of physicsRelated: It became one institutional means of scrutinizing and circulating physical results.

• MythBustersCompared with: Televised demonstrations were not substitutes for the scrutiny and documentation expected in peer-reviewed research.

• ProtoscienceRelated: Critical scrutiny can expose weak methods and improve standards as a field takes shape.

• ResearchRelated: It subjects research claims and methods to scrutiny by other experts.

• Scientific ReportsRelated: Scientific Reports uses peer review to assess whether submitted research is scientifically sound.

• Scientific writingRelated: Review tests whether a manuscript's methods, evidence, and claims withstand expert scrutiny.

• The BMJRelated: Independent expert assessment is one part of the journal’s process for evaluating submitted research.

• Anesthesia and AnalgesiaRelated: The journal uses expert review to assess submitted research.

• Argument from authorityRelated: Review offers a check on individual authority, though it does not guarantee that a claim is true.

• Comptes rendus de l'Académie des SciencesRelated: Editorial assessment shapes which research submissions appear in the journal.

• Funding of scienceRelated: Review panels often assess proposals before funding decisions are made.

• History of the social sciencesRelated: It became a key institution for validating and regulating disciplinary knowledge.

• Johannes FibigerNarrower topic: Peer scrutiny and subsequent research helped revise the interpretation of Fibiger’s experimental results.

• Literature (scholarly publications)Related: Peer review is one process through which research enters the published record.

• Malcolm GladwellCompared with: It contrasts popular synthesis with the scrutiny applied to research claims.

• Mind (philosophy journal)Related: Editorial assessment and scholarly standards underpin Mind’s role as an academic journal.

• Porntip RojanasunanRelated: Independent scrutiny offers one way to test forensic methods and conclusions.

• Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaRelated: Submitted PNAS research is assessed for scientific quality before publication.

• Proceedings of the Royal SocietyRelated: Peer review is the editorial process used to assess research submitted to the journal.