Linked from

The 15 pages that link to Super-Earth, each with the reason it gives.

• ExoplanetBroader topic: This common exoplanet size class has no close counterpart among the Solar System’s planets.

• Hot JupiterCompared with: Super-Earths contrast with hot Jupiters in size and likely bulk composition despite sometimes sharing close orbits.

• Exoplanet atmosphereBroader topic: Atmospheric measurements can help distinguish rocky super-Earths from planets with thick gas envelopes.

• Pebble accretionRelated: Pebble-fed growth is one pathway proposed for producing close-in planets of this size.

• Terrestrial planetRelated: The label describes a size range, not a guaranteed rocky composition, complicating terrestrial-planet comparisons.

• Earth analogCompared with: Many proposed analogs are larger than Earth and may differ substantially in structure.

• Giant planetCompared with: Super-Earths occupy a lower-mass regime where composition does not map neatly onto a single planet type.

• Kepler-22bRelated: Its estimated radius places Kepler-22b among planets often discussed as super-Earths or sub-Neptunes.

• Kepler-452bNarrower topic: Kepler-452b’s estimated radius places it near a size range where rocky and volatile-rich compositions are both possible.

• Chthonian planetCompared with: A rocky super-Earth can resemble a stripped core without having originated as a gas giant.

• Kepler-442bNarrower topic: Its estimated size places it in this category, without establishing that it resembles Earth.

• 55 Cancri eNarrower topic: Its mass places it in this broad size class, not in a proven compositional category.

• Gliese 581dRelated: The proposed mass placed Gliese 581d among planets commonly described as super-Earths.

• Iron planetNarrower topic: Iron planets can occupy the super-Earth size range, but size alone does not establish composition.

• K2-18bCompared with: K2-18b lies near the size-based distinction between super-Earths and sub-Neptunes.