Linked from

The 122 pages that link to Textual criticism, each with the reason it gives.

• Textual transmissionRelated: Comparing surviving copies helps identify how a work changed during transmission.

• Biblical translationRelated: Translators compare textual witnesses when biblical manuscripts differ.

• FootnoteRelated: Footnotes became a place to record variant readings and editorial decisions.

• Papias of HierapolisRelated: The surviving fragments must be evaluated through their later quotations and transmission.

• Sanskrit Buddhist literatureRelated: It helps assess variant readings across manuscripts and translated versions.

• ĀgamaRelated: Comparing Chinese, Pali, and other witnesses helps identify shared and divergent readings.

• ArielNarrower topic: Ariel’s competing arrangements make editorial history part of interpreting the collection.

• Literary forgeryRelated: Comparing witnesses can reveal additions, substitutions, and false claims of textual descent.

• MarcionismRelated: Reconstructing Marcion’s edited Gospel and letters depends on reports and textual evidence that require critical comparison.

• Max MüllerRelated: Müller’s editions required comparing manuscript traditions and making editorial decisions.

• PapyrologyRelated: Fragmentary or variant papyrus copies can preserve evidence for reconstructing texts.

• First FolioNarrower topic: Editors collate Folio and quarto witnesses to reconstruct Shakespeare’s texts.

• Historical-critical methodRelated: It compares surviving manuscripts to examine how a text changed during copying.

• Manuscript studiesRelated: It traces how copying altered texts across manuscript witnesses.

• Biblical studiesRelated: It helps establish what can be known about the wording of biblical texts.

• Joseph Justus ScaligerNarrower topic: Scaliger used textual comparison to correct and assess classical works.

• Manuscript traditionRelated: It compares manuscript readings to reconstruct earlier stages of transmission.

• PatristicsRelated: It helps establish reliable versions of patristic writings from variant manuscripts.

• Pauline authorshipRelated: Manuscript evidence can clarify a letter's wording, though it rarely settles who composed it.

• Vedic chantCompared with: Oral recitation offers a distinct means of textual preservation alongside comparison of written witnesses.

• ApologeticsRelated: Apologists use manuscript evidence to assess the reliability of sacred texts.

• Aulus GelliusRelated: Gellius compares readings and records judgments about the wording of older authors.

• ClassicsRelated: Surviving classical works often differ across manuscripts, requiring reasoned editorial choices.

• Library of AmericaRelated: Its methods help editors identify the most reliable text for each volume.

• Sanskrit manuscriptNarrower topic: It compares manuscript witnesses to reconstruct a text's transmission.

• Gothic BibleRelated: Scholars use manuscript variants and gaps to establish the Gothic wording.

• Henry Louis Gates Jr.Related: Gates’s work on literary history includes recovering and contextualizing texts across editions and archives.

• Isaac CasaubonRelated: His editions relied on comparing manuscripts and earlier printed versions.

• Leaves of GrassRelated: Its methods help distinguish the book’s many versions and editorial decisions.

• Luo GuanzhongNarrower topic: Comparing editions is necessary to investigate the novel’s layered textual history.

• PalaeographyRelated: Identifying scripts and scribal practices helps assess how manuscript readings arose.

• Quranic studiesRelated: It offers tools for analyzing variant readings and manuscript relationships.

• Zuo QiumingRelated: Disputes about the Zuo Zhuan's authorship and relationship to the Annals depend on textual evidence.

• English studiesRelated: It helps establish which wording literary and historical interpretation should address.

• Friedrich August WolfNarrower topic: Wolf used critical comparison to question how the surviving Homeric text acquired its form.

• Ulrich von Wilamowitz-MoellendorffRelated: His editions used manuscript comparison to establish texts for historical and literary study.

• Wilhelm GrimmRelated: Comparing variants was central to the Grimms’ scholarly treatment of tales and manuscripts.

• Ancient historyRelated: Most ancient works survive through later copies that may differ from lost originals.

• IotacismRelated: Vowel confusions linked to iotacism can help explain spelling variants in Greek manuscripts.

• Karl LachmannNarrower topic: Lachmann helped make its systematic, evidence-based practice central to philology.

• New International VersionRelated: The NIV translators compare biblical manuscripts when source-text readings differ.

• Renaissance philosophyRelated: Philological scrutiny altered how authoritative philosophical and religious texts were read.

• Wen XuanRelated: Manuscripts and commentaries preserve differing readings of anthology passages.

• William LanglandRelated: Scholars use it to compare the poem’s versions and assess claims about Langland’s authorship.

• A. E. HousmanNarrower topic: Housman’s editions exemplify rigorous, often conjectural textual criticism.

• DaśakumāracaritaRelated: Differences among witnesses complicate decisions about the romance’s original wording and structure.

• Elizabeth EisensteinRelated: Printed copies enabled scholars to compare versions across wider distances.

• Interpretation (hermeneutics)Related: Interpretation depends on knowing which words and textual versions are being interpreted.

• Li ShizhenRelated: He compared earlier authorities and challenged inherited errors in drug descriptions.

• Martin Litchfield WestRelated: West’s editions used textual criticism to reconstruct ancient poems from damaged transmission.