KnowraTrolley problemLinked fromLinked fromThe 16 pages that link to Trolley problem, each with the reason it gives.All 16Broader topic 7Related 8Compared with 1UtilitarianismRelated: Its cases expose tension between maximizing lives saved and constraints on causing harm.ConsequentialismRelated: Its variants test whether outcome-based reasoning permits sacrificing one person.DeontologyBroader topic: Its variants test whether duties forbid using one person as a means to save others.Moral luckRelated: Its controlled variations isolate how circumstances alter judgments of responsibility.Moral judgmentBroader topic: Its variations test which features change judgments about harming and saving.Moral dilemmaBroader topic: It isolates conflict between preventing greater harm and directly causing harm.Autonomous vehicleRelated: It frames public debate about how automated systems should respond to unavoidable collisions.Moral particularismBroader topic: Its variations probe whether small contextual changes alter the moral force of reasons.Thought experimentBroader topic: Its controlled variations probe tensions between consequences and duties.Moral absolutismRelated: Its variants test whether an absolute ban on intentional harm survives tragic trade-offs.Act utilitarianismBroader topic: Its variants test whether maximizing lives saved justifies directly harming one person.Rule utilitarianismRelated: It tests whether general rules about killing and rescue differ from case-by-case utility judgments.Darkness at NoonCompared with: Rubashov’s utilitarian reasoning resembles consequentialist dilemmas, but under coercive political power.Ethical dilemmaBroader topic: It isolates conflict between minimizing harm and refusing to cause harm directly.Judith Jarvis ThomsonRelated: Her discussion of trolley cases tests how rights constrain choices that could save more lives.Self-driving carRelated: It frames public debate about how automated systems should handle unavoidable crashes.
KnowraTrolley problemLinked fromLinked fromThe 16 pages that link to Trolley problem, each with the reason it gives.All 16Broader topic 7Related 8Compared with 1UtilitarianismRelated: Its cases expose tension between maximizing lives saved and constraints on causing harm.ConsequentialismRelated: Its variants test whether outcome-based reasoning permits sacrificing one person.DeontologyBroader topic: Its variants test whether duties forbid using one person as a means to save others.Moral luckRelated: Its controlled variations isolate how circumstances alter judgments of responsibility.Moral judgmentBroader topic: Its variations test which features change judgments about harming and saving.Moral dilemmaBroader topic: It isolates conflict between preventing greater harm and directly causing harm.Autonomous vehicleRelated: It frames public debate about how automated systems should respond to unavoidable collisions.Moral particularismBroader topic: Its variations probe whether small contextual changes alter the moral force of reasons.Thought experimentBroader topic: Its controlled variations probe tensions between consequences and duties.Moral absolutismRelated: Its variants test whether an absolute ban on intentional harm survives tragic trade-offs.Act utilitarianismBroader topic: Its variants test whether maximizing lives saved justifies directly harming one person.Rule utilitarianismRelated: It tests whether general rules about killing and rescue differ from case-by-case utility judgments.Darkness at NoonCompared with: Rubashov’s utilitarian reasoning resembles consequentialist dilemmas, but under coercive political power.Ethical dilemmaBroader topic: It isolates conflict between minimizing harm and refusing to cause harm directly.Judith Jarvis ThomsonRelated: Her discussion of trolley cases tests how rights constrain choices that could save more lives.Self-driving carRelated: It frames public debate about how automated systems should handle unavoidable crashes.