Linked from

The 13 pages that link to Community-Based Natural Resource Management, each with the reason it gives.

• Human–wildlife conflictRelated: Local authority and benefits can make wildlife costs more acceptable to affected communities.

• Wildlife managementRelated: It shifts management decisions toward people who live with wildlife and bear its costs.

• Elinor OstromRelated: Ostrom’s findings strengthened arguments for including local users in resource governance.

• OverexploitationRelated: Local rules and monitoring can align resource use with conditions on the ground.

• BotswanaRelated: Botswana uses community-based programs to connect conservation with rural livelihoods.

• Quechua peopleRelated: Quechua communities use local institutions and knowledge to manage shared landscapes and resources.

• Okavango DeltaRelated: Botswana uses community-based management around the delta, including for wildlife tourism.

• Sustainable useRelated: Local rules and stewardship can shape how resource use is monitored and shared.

• Sustainable harvestingRelated: Local monitoring and rights can influence compliance and the distribution of harvest benefits.

• Natural resource managementRelated: It makes local authority and participation explicit management choices.

• Great Limpopo Transfrontier ParkRelated: Local support and benefit-sharing influence whether conservation succeeds beyond protected-area boundaries.

• Kavango–Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation AreaRelated: Community participation helps align local livelihoods with KAZA’s conservation aims.