Linked from

The 33 pages that link to Inference, each with the reason it gives.

• Unreliable narratorRelated: Clues scattered through narration let the text imply more than its speaker understands or admits.

• PropositionRelated: Logical relations among propositions determine which conclusions follow from premises.

• TestimonyCompared with: Inference can support beliefs through reasoning rather than accepting a speaker's assertion.

• EvidenceRelated: Evidence supports claims through inferential steps whose soundness determines how much it establishes.

• Rule of inferenceRelated: A rule of inference formalizes permissible steps within the broader process of inference.

• AnalogyRelated: An analogy suggests conclusions, but its comparisons alone do not prove them.

• PremiseRelated: It is the step that links premises to a conclusion.

• ObservationRelated: Observations are records; conclusions drawn from them require inference.

• NyayaRelated: Nyaya analyzes inference through the relation between evidence and what it establishes.

• DivinationCompared with: Inference can produce hidden conclusions, but does not require ritual or supernatural agency.

• MicrohistoryRelated: Sparse records require explicit reasoning about what evidence can and cannot establish.

• ArgumentRelated: Inference connects an argument’s supporting claims to its conclusion.

• Stoic logicRelated: Stoic logic studies which premise patterns license a conclusion.

• Circumstantial evidenceNarrower topic: Circumstantial evidence works by inferring an unobserved conclusion from observed facts.

• CommunicationRelated: Listeners infer intended meanings that speakers leave unstated.

• ConclusionRelated: It is the reasoning step that connects premises to a conclusion.

• Empirical evidenceRelated: Evidence does not speak by itself; conclusions require inferential steps.

• Intelligence analysisRelated: Analytic judgments extend beyond reported facts through explicit or implicit inference.

• Buddhist epistemologyRelated: Buddhist thinkers treat inference as the other principal source of valid cognition.

• Buddhist logicNarrower topic: Inference is the central form of reasoning analyzed in Buddhist logic.

• DharmakīrtiRelated: His account explains how signs warrant conclusions about objects not directly perceived.

• JustificationRelated: Inferential justification passes support from premises to a conclusion.

• Reductio ad absurdumNarrower topic: The assumed claim must lead to the absurdity through acceptable steps of inference.

• Language of thought hypothesisRelated: Symbolic rules offer one account of how structured thoughts support reasoning.

• SautrāntikaRelated: External objects are inferred from the representations they causally produce.

• KnowledgeRelated: Reasoning extends knowledge beyond what is directly observed.

• VaisheshikaRelated: Inference lets Vaisheshika argue for atoms and other imperceptible entities from observed effects.

• R. G. CollingwoodRelated: Historical reconstruction depends on reasoning from surviving traces to past thought.

• ScientistRelated: Scientists use inference to interpret observations and connect them to explanations.

• AcceptanceRelated: Acceptance enables a proposition to figure in reasoning toward further conclusions.

• Research methodologyRelated: Methodology assesses whether evidence warrants the conclusions drawn from it.

• Informal logicRelated: The inferential connection determines how premises are supposed to support a conclusion.

• Knowledge (law)Related: Factfinders commonly infer awareness from conduct, statements, and surrounding circumstances.