Linked from

The 76 pages that link to International humanitarian law, each with the reason it gives.

• Just war theoryRelated: Its legal rules overlap with, but are distinct from, just-war principles about conduct.

• Humanitarian interventionRelated: Even a protective intervention must comply with rules on distinction, proportionality, and civilian protection.

• International Committee of the Red CrossRelated: This is the legal framework the ICRC promotes and helps parties apply.

• Urban warfareRelated: Its rules on distinction, proportionality, and precautions constrain attacks in populated areas.

• CeasefireRelated: A ceasefire pauses combat but does not replace legal duties that apply during conflict.

• International criminal lawRelated: Its rules supply much of the conduct that war-crime prosecutions enforce.

• CyberwarfareRelated: Its principles govern cyber operations when they occur in armed conflict.

• Military aviationRelated: Its rules govern targeting and the conduct of military air operations.

• WarRelated: It regulates conduct during war without deciding whether a war’s political cause is justified.

• Proxy warRelated: Foreign support does not remove sponsors’ obligations when they become parties to a conflict.

• Naval mineRelated: Legal rules constrain mine use and require precautions to protect civilians.

• Customary international lawRelated: Many rules governing armed conflict bind states as custom as well as through treaties.

• Improvised explosive deviceRelated: Use of improvised explosive weapons in conflict is assessed under these rules.

• State responsibilityRelated: Violations can engage state responsibility alongside individual criminal liability.

• Precision-guided munitionRelated: Guided weapons remain subject to legal duties of distinction, proportionality, and precaution.

• Autonomous weaponRelated: Its rules on distinction, proportionality, and precautions frame assessments of autonomous attacks.

• Bombing of GuernicaRelated: Guernica's civilian destruction sharpened questions about limits on aerial attacks.

• Military justiceRelated: Military offenses may involve violations of the laws governing conduct in war.

• Military technologyRelated: Technology raises questions about distinction, proportionality, and responsibility in combat.

• Land warfareRelated: Ground combat raises rules about civilians, prisoners, and methods of attack.

• Emir AbdelkaderRelated: His protection of civilians is often compared with principles later formalized in this field.

• Law of warRelated: This body of rules supplies much of the law governing conduct in war.

• Molotov cocktailRelated: Incendiary weapons raise legal concerns about civilian harm and distinction in warfare.

• Alberico GentiliRelated: His analysis of wartime conduct belongs to the longer history of legal limits on war.

• Hollow-point bulletRelated: Its treaty rules include a specific restriction on expanding bullets in international armed conflict.

• Twelve-Day WarRelated: Civilian casualties and attacks on infrastructure raised questions about obligations during war.

• War studiesRelated: It translates analysis of wartime conduct into legal rules and obligations.

• 2026 Iran warRelated: Its rules apply to attacks, detention, and civilian protection during the war.

• Church of Saint PorphyriusRelated: The strike raised questions about civilian protection and the legal safeguards for religious sites.

• FlechetteRelated: Its rules frame disputes over flechette use and civilian harm.

• Israeli strikes on IranRelated: The strikes raised legal questions about targets, civilian harm, and proportionality.