Linked from

The 40 pages that link to International Military Tribunal for the Far East, each with the reason it gives.

• Nuremberg TrialsRelated: It applied a related Allied tribunal model in the Pacific theater.

• Second Sino-Japanese WarRelated: The tribunal addressed responsibility for Japanese aggression and wartime atrocities.

• War crimeRelated: Its judgments addressed responsibility for wartime atrocities and command failures.

• Imperial Japanese ArmyRelated: The trials examined responsibility for wartime aggression and atrocities by military leaders.

• Douglas MacArthurRelated: MacArthur established the tribunal as part of the occupation’s prosecution of wartime leaders.

• International Criminal Tribunal for the former YugoslaviaRelated: Like Nuremberg, they offer a historical comparison for the ICTY’s prosecutions.

• Postwar JapanRelated: The trials addressed responsibility for wartime aggression and atrocities.

• International Military TribunalRelated: It applied a related Allied tribunal model to Japanese defendants.

• Japanese war crimesRelated: The tribunal prosecuted selected leaders for crimes arising from Japan’s wartime conduct.

• Nanjing MassacreRelated: The tribunal considered evidence about atrocities committed at Nanjing.

• HirohitoRelated: Hirohito was not indicted, a decision central to debates about responsibility for wartime policy.

• Japanese militarismRelated: The trials assigned criminal responsibility to leaders of Japan’s wartime state.

• Surrender of JapanRelated: The surrender enabled Allied authorities to detain and prosecute wartime leaders.

• Yasukuni ShrineRelated: Its convictions underpin the dispute over honoring the war criminals enshrined at Yasukuni.

• TreasonRelated: Their proceedings illustrate the distinction between domestic treason and international crimes.

• Crime against peaceRelated: The tribunal also prosecuted leaders for planning and waging aggressive war.

• Crime of aggressionRelated: The tribunal applied the crimes-against-peace framework beyond the European trials.

• Kwantung ArmyRelated: The tribunal examined Japanese aggression and the military system that enabled it.

• Unit 731Related: The tribunal did not prosecute Unit 731's human experimentation or biological warfare crimes.

• Nobusuke KishiRelated: Kishi was arrested as a suspected Class-A war criminal but was never tried.

• Empire of JapanRelated: The proceedings addressed legal responsibility for wartime aggression and atrocities.

• Kōichi KidoRelated: Kido testified and was tried there for his conduct as a senior wartime official.

• Nuremberg executionsRelated: The Nuremberg proceedings and punishments became a model and point of comparison for Tokyo.

• Supreme Commander for the Allied PowersRelated: The occupation authority supported the tribunal that pursued accountability for wartime leadership.

• World War II in the PacificRelated: The tribunal addressed responsibility for Japanese aggression and wartime atrocities.

• Nanjing Massacre denialRelated: Its judgment addressed the Nanjing atrocities, though later deniers contest its findings.

• Radhabinod PalRelated: Pal served as the tribunal’s Indian member and wrote its sole dissenting judgment.

• Shirō IshiiRelated: The tribunal did not prosecute Ishii or publicly examine Unit 731’s crimes.

• Akira MutōRelated: It convicted Mutō and sentenced him to death.

• Ben FerenczRelated: Its parallel proceedings extended individual accountability beyond the European Nuremberg trials.

• Seiichi MorimuraRelated: The trial forms part of the postwar context for public debate about Japanese war crimes.