KnowraJohn RawlsLinked fromLinked fromThe 24 pages that link to John Rawls, each with the reason it gives.All 24Related 18Compared with 6Civil disobedienceRelated: His framework gives a prominent liberal justification for publicly challenging unjust laws.Political legitimacyRelated: Rawls connects political legitimacy to public justification among free and equal citizens.Deliberative democracyRelated: His account of public reason shaped debates about justification in pluralist democracies.Amartya SenCompared with: Sen challenged whether a focus on ideal institutions adequately addresses actual injustice.CommunitarianismCompared with: His account of justice became the principal liberal target of communitarian criticism.JusticeRelated: His principles address equal liberties and inequalities in social and economic arrangements.Distributive JusticeRelated: Rawls gives distributive justice a leading institutional account through principles chosen behind a veil of ignorance.KantianismRelated: Rawls revived a Kantian style of political justification through free and equal rational agents.Martha NussbaumCompared with: Nussbaum adapts and criticizes Rawlsian liberalism, especially its treatment of disability and global justice.Harm principleRelated: Rawls develops liberal limits on state power while treating Mill’s framework critically.EgalitarianismRelated: His difference principle makes inequalities answerable to the interests of the worst-off.Equality of outcomeRelated: His difference principle permits inequalities only when they benefit the least advantaged.Moral universalismRelated: His framework seeks principles that people could accept without knowing their social position.Reflective equilibriumRelated: Rawls developed reflective equilibrium as a method for justifying principles of justice.Thomas NagelRelated: Rawls provides a major framework for political equality that Nagel engages and develops alongside.Global justiceRelated: His international theory assigns states duties of assistance but rejects a global distributive principle.Lawrence KohlbergRelated: Kohlberg drew on Rawls’s account of justice when describing principled moral reasoning.Robert NozickCompared with: Rawls’s egalitarian account became the leading contemporary alternative to Nozick’s entitlement theory.Alasdair MacIntyreCompared with: Rawls grounds political principles in a hypothetical choice procedure, unlike MacIntyre’s tradition-bound inquiry.Green liberalismRelated: His account of just institutions includes questions about duties to future generations.Jeremy WaldronRelated: Rawls’s account of political justice provides a major background for contemporary debates Waldron engages.Social philosophyRelated: His principles frame modern debates about distributive justice and institutional fairness.History of liberalismRelated: His twentieth-century theory renewed liberalism’s account of justice and political legitimacy.Thomas SowellCompared with: Rawls’s framework offers a prominent alternative to Sowell’s skepticism about designing distributive outcomes.
KnowraJohn RawlsLinked fromLinked fromThe 24 pages that link to John Rawls, each with the reason it gives.All 24Related 18Compared with 6Civil disobedienceRelated: His framework gives a prominent liberal justification for publicly challenging unjust laws.Political legitimacyRelated: Rawls connects political legitimacy to public justification among free and equal citizens.Deliberative democracyRelated: His account of public reason shaped debates about justification in pluralist democracies.Amartya SenCompared with: Sen challenged whether a focus on ideal institutions adequately addresses actual injustice.CommunitarianismCompared with: His account of justice became the principal liberal target of communitarian criticism.JusticeRelated: His principles address equal liberties and inequalities in social and economic arrangements.Distributive JusticeRelated: Rawls gives distributive justice a leading institutional account through principles chosen behind a veil of ignorance.KantianismRelated: Rawls revived a Kantian style of political justification through free and equal rational agents.Martha NussbaumCompared with: Nussbaum adapts and criticizes Rawlsian liberalism, especially its treatment of disability and global justice.Harm principleRelated: Rawls develops liberal limits on state power while treating Mill’s framework critically.EgalitarianismRelated: His difference principle makes inequalities answerable to the interests of the worst-off.Equality of outcomeRelated: His difference principle permits inequalities only when they benefit the least advantaged.Moral universalismRelated: His framework seeks principles that people could accept without knowing their social position.Reflective equilibriumRelated: Rawls developed reflective equilibrium as a method for justifying principles of justice.Thomas NagelRelated: Rawls provides a major framework for political equality that Nagel engages and develops alongside.Global justiceRelated: His international theory assigns states duties of assistance but rejects a global distributive principle.Lawrence KohlbergRelated: Kohlberg drew on Rawls’s account of justice when describing principled moral reasoning.Robert NozickCompared with: Rawls’s egalitarian account became the leading contemporary alternative to Nozick’s entitlement theory.Alasdair MacIntyreCompared with: Rawls grounds political principles in a hypothetical choice procedure, unlike MacIntyre’s tradition-bound inquiry.Green liberalismRelated: His account of just institutions includes questions about duties to future generations.Jeremy WaldronRelated: Rawls’s account of political justice provides a major background for contemporary debates Waldron engages.Social philosophyRelated: His principles frame modern debates about distributive justice and institutional fairness.History of liberalismRelated: His twentieth-century theory renewed liberalism’s account of justice and political legitimacy.Thomas SowellCompared with: Rawls’s framework offers a prominent alternative to Sowell’s skepticism about designing distributive outcomes.