Linked from

The 44 pages that link to Madhyamaka, each with the reason it gives.

• Buddha-natureCompared with: Its emphasis on emptiness challenges readings of Buddha-nature as a substantial essence.

• XuanzangCompared with: Xuanzang's Yogācāra commitments differed from Madhyamaka interpretations debated in Chinese Buddhism.

• YogācāraCompared with: Its approach to emptiness differs from Yogācāra’s characteristic analysis of consciousness.

• MonismCompared with: Its rejection of intrinsic foundations differs from monism’s assertion of one ultimate principle.

• AbhidharmaCompared with: Madhyamaka critiques Abhidharma claims that dharmas possess ultimate existence.

• VasubandhuCompared with: Its approach to emptiness differs from Yogācāra’s characteristic analysis of cognition and experience.

• VisuddhimaggaCompared with: Its philosophical method differs from the Visuddhimagga’s Theravada Abhidhamma framework.

• DharmapālaCompared with: Its analyses of emptiness differ from Yogācāra accounts of consciousness and experience.

• PudgalavādaCompared with: Its account of conventional persons does not posit the Pudgalavādin’s distinctive pudgala.

• AnekantavadaCompared with: Madhyamaka's analysis of emptiness differs from Jain claims about substances and their many aspects.

• Xiong ShiliCompared with: Xiong rejects an interpretation of emptiness that, in his view, cannot affirm the creative reality of the world.

• East Asian YogācāraCompared with: Its critique of intrinsic nature supplied a rival framework for interpreting Yogācāra claims.