Linked from

The 155 pages that link to Molecular phylogenetics, each with the reason it gives.

• CharacidaeRelated: Genetic studies continue to test which lineages properly belong within Characidae.

• HelicidaeRelated: DNA analyses can test whether traditional shell-based helicid classifications reflect ancestry.

• HomininaeRelated: DNA comparisons help establish relationships among hominine lineages.

• IchthyosporeaRelated: Sequence comparisons established Ichthyosporea as a distinct opisthokont lineage.

• LacertidaeRelated: Genetic analyses have reshaped hypotheses about relationships among lacertid genera.

• MacraucheniaRelated: Protein evidence helped place litopterns closer to perissodactyls than earlier anatomy-based schemes suggested.

• MesonychiaRelated: Molecular results reshaped hypotheses linking whales with hoofed mammals.

• Nucleic acid sequenceRelated: Shared sequence changes provide evidence about common ancestry.

• PalpigradiRelated: Genetic evidence can test palpigrade relationships that morphology alone has left uncertain.

• PeramelemorphiaRelated: DNA comparisons have helped resolve relationships among peramelemorphian families.

• PrimulaceaeNarrower topic: DNA evidence drove the merger of several formerly separate families into Primulaceae.

• XiphosuraRelated: Genetic evidence has challenged classifications based mainly on horseshoe crab body form.

• AccipiterRelated: Genetic evidence helps test whether traditional Accipiter groupings reflect evolutionary history.

• BlastocladiomycotaRelated: Sequence evidence supported separating blastoclads from traditional chytrid groupings.

• CharophytaRelated: Sequence comparisons have reshaped the placement of charophyte groups and land plants.

• CyprinodontiformesRelated: Genetic analyses help resolve deep branching patterns within the order.

• DiaphoretickesNarrower topic: Diaphoretickes is assessed through comparisons of molecular sequence data.

• DibamidaeRelated: Genetic analyses have reshaped hypotheses about where dibamids branch within Squamata.

• ErebidaeRelated: DNA evidence helped establish Erebidae as distinct from a narrower Noctuidae.

• EupleridaeRelated: Genetic comparisons revealed the shared ancestry behind the family’s misleadingly diverse forms.

• Haast's eagleRelated: DNA comparisons helped reveal the eagle’s relationship to smaller living eagles.

• LecanoralesRelated: Molecular phylogenies have clarified relationships among Lecanorales families and genera.

• OrthonectidaBroader topic: Sequence comparisons helped reveal that orthonectid simplicity arose within a more complex animal lineage.

• VireoRelated: Genetic analyses help distinguish vireo relationships that appearance alone can obscure.

• VombatiformesRelated: Genetic comparisons of living wombats and koalas complement fossil-based classifications.

• XenacoelomorphaRelated: Sequence-based studies have driven debate over the clade's position among bilaterians.

• AgaricusRelated: DNA-based analyses have clarified relationships and species limits within Agaricus.

• AphelidaRelated: Sequence analyses established aphelids as a distinct, deeply branching opisthokont lineage.

• Armen TakhtajanRelated: Molecular evidence later tested and revised relationships inferred in Takhtajan’s morphology-based work.

• BassaricyonRelated: Genetic evidence helped distinguish olingo species and clarify their relationships.

• BikontRelated: Sequence-based trees test whether the groups assigned to Bikonta share ancestry.

• ChelodinaRelated: Genetic studies help resolve relationships among Chelodina species and related turtles.

• CirsiumRelated: DNA comparisons help resolve relationships that morphology alone can leave uncertain in Cirsium.

• ElaninaeRelated: Genetic evidence helps test whether traditional kite groupings reflect shared ancestry.

• EntorrhizomycetesRelated: Sequence evidence has helped establish the class as a distinct fungal lineage.

• Evolution of molluscsRelated: Sequence data reshaped hypotheses about relationships among living molluscs.

• Fungi imperfectiRelated: DNA comparisons can place asexual forms within lineages that morphology alone could not connect.

• GnetidaeRelated: Molecular evidence has reshaped hypotheses about gnetophyte relationships to other seed plants.

• Gnetum gnemonRelated: Genetic analyses reshaped hypotheses about where Gnetales, including Gnetum, belong among seed plants.

• GobiinaeRelated: Genetic data can test whether traditional goby groupings reflect ancestry.

• HomosclerophoridaRelated: Sequence evidence helped establish Homoscleromorpha as a distinct sponge class.

• Hump-winged grigRelated: Sequence comparisons test how Cyphoderris relates to other ensiferan insects.

• IctonychinaeRelated: Genetic comparisons helped establish Ictonychinae as a distinct mustelid grouping.

• Incertae sedisRelated: Sequence comparisons can clarify placements that morphology leaves uncertain.

• LimnognathiaRelated: Sequence-based analyses help test where Micrognathozoa belongs among animal groups.

• MucoromycotinaRelated: Sequence comparisons reshaped the placement of groups once lumped as zygomycetes.

• NeogaleRelated: Genetic analyses helped establish Neogale as distinct from Mustela.

• Northern storm petrelRelated: Molecular evidence helped clarify relationships within the traditional storm petrel grouping.

• Phylogenetics of flowering plantsRelated: Sequence comparisons provide much of the evidence used to resolve angiosperm branches.

• ProtistologyRelated: Sequence comparisons revealed deep protist lineages that morphology alone had obscured.