Linked from

The 13 pages that link to Strict liability, each with the reason it gives.

• Doping in sportRelated: Anti-doping rules apply this principle even when contamination or mistake is claimed.

• Mens reaCompared with: These offenses limit or displace mens rea requirements for specified elements.

• NegligenceCompared with: It permits liability even when the defendant exercised reasonable care.

• Actus reusCompared with: It shows that proving actus reus does not always require proving mens rea for every element.

• Criminal responsibilityCompared with: It contrasts with offenses requiring proof of a culpable mental state.

• Vicarious liabilityRelated: Vicarious liability can operate without employer fault, but depends on another person’s wrongful act and a qualifying relationship.

• ResponsibilityCompared with: It assigns responsibility even when intention or negligence is absent.

• Tort lawRelated: Some torts impose liability without proof of negligence or intent.

• TortBroader topic: Some torts impose responsibility even when the defendant took care.

• Dick PoundRelated: The principle captures the enforcement-first approach Pound defended amid disputes over fairness.

• Intentional tortCompared with: It contrasts with intentional torts, which turn on the defendant’s state of mind.

• Legal liabilityRelated: It imposes liability for specified harms even when reasonable care was taken.

• Substantive lawCompared with: It contrasts with substantive offenses and claims that require proof of intent or negligence.