Linked from

The 35 pages that link to Subsidiarity, each with the reason it gives.

• ConservatismRelated: It connects conservative respect for local institutions with limits on centralized authority.

• European Coal and Steel CommunityRelated: The ECSC’s narrow sectoral powers invite questions about the proper level of European authority.

• Catholic social teachingRelated: It limits centralized power while requiring larger institutions to support smaller communities.

• Christian democracyRelated: It limits central authority while assigning larger institutions responsibility when local bodies cannot act effectively.

• Local governmentRelated: It offers a rationale for assigning suitable responsibilities to local authorities.

• Fiscal federalismRelated: It offers a normative guide for allocating responsibilities across levels.

• DevolutionRelated: It offers a rationale for assigning responsibilities to regional or local institutions.

• EuroscepticismRelated: It offers a standard for disputing whether decisions belong at EU or national level.

• LocalizationRelated: It applies localization to the assignment of political and administrative responsibilities.

• SupranationalismRelated: It sets a rationale for deciding when action should move from national to EU level.

• DecentralizationRelated: It gives a rule for deciding which responsibilities belong at local rather than central levels.

• Single European ActRelated: The treaty introduced subsidiarity into Community treaty language for areas outside exclusive Community competence.

• Swiss ConfederationRelated: It helps explain why Swiss public responsibilities are often kept close to cantons and communes.

• FederationRelated: It offers a rule for deciding which responsibilities belong to federal or constituent governments.

• Common goodRelated: It asks how pursuit of shared goods can respect local agency.

• Swiss federalismRelated: It captures the logic behind leaving many Swiss public tasks close to local communities.

• European federalismRelated: It offers a rule for deciding which powers belong at European rather than national level.

• National conservatismRelated: It offers a model for balancing local self-government with national authority.

• PersonalismRelated: It translates respect for persons and associations into a rule for political organization.

• Democratic confederalismRelated: It clarifies why decisions are assigned locally rather than centralized.

• DistributismRelated: It supports local control and limits the concentration of economic and political authority.

• AutonomismRelated: It supplies a rationale for assigning local matters to self-governing regions.

• Preferential option for the poorRelated: Subsidiarity pairs concern for the poor with attention to their agency and local communities.

• Traditionalist conservatismRelated: It supports authority distributed among families, communities, and local institutions.

• BioregionalismRelated: It supports bioregionalism’s preference for locally grounded decisions about local conditions.

• European valuesRelated: It raises questions about which level should protect shared principles.

• Pro-EuropeanismRelated: It addresses concerns that European cooperation can transfer too much authority upward.

• Territorial governanceRelated: It guides how responsibilities are allocated among territorial authorities.