KnowraWestern SchismLinked fromLinked fromThe 24 pages that link to Western Schism, each with the reason it gives.All 24Broader topic 6Related 13Narrower topic 4Compared with 1University of ParisRelated: The university’s theologians and masters took part in debates over ending the division.Avignon PapacyRelated: The disputed election after Gregory XI’s return turned tensions surrounding the Avignon papacy into rival obediences.Papal supremacyRelated: Competing popes raised a practical crisis for claims of unique supreme authority.PopeBroader topic: It fractured obedience to the papacy and forced the Church to resolve competing claims.Council of ConstanceNarrower topic: Ending these competing papal claims was the council’s most urgent task.Jan HusRelated: Competing popes sharpened Hus’s claim that a pope’s authority depended on faithful conduct.ConciliarismRelated: Competing popes prompted arguments that a council could restore unity and judge papal claimants.PapacyRelated: Competing papal claims weakened confidence in the institution’s unity.Catherine of SienaRelated: Catherine’s support for Urban VI came amid this crisis of papal legitimacy.Council of BaselNarrower topic: The schism made church unity and the limits of papal authority urgent questions.Papal monarchyBroader topic: Rival popes undermined the credibility of a single, centralized source of authority.Hussite WarsRelated: The divided church formed the wider setting for disputes over reform and authority.Pope Martin VRelated: Martin V’s election at Constance ended this long contest among rival papal claimants.AvignonRelated: The schism prolonged Avignon’s papal significance after the popes returned to Rome.Late Middle AgesBroader topic: Competing popes made the period’s crisis of church authority visible.Pope Boniface VIIIRelated: The later crisis deepened questions of papal authority that Boniface’s pontificate had sharpened.Pope John XXIICompared with: Unlike John’s single papal reign at Avignon, this later crisis divided obedience among competing claimants.Pope Urban VIBroader topic: Urban’s election began the schism when cardinals rejected his authority and elected a rival.AntipopeBroader topic: Its competing papal lines made the distinction between pope and antipope especially consequential.Clement VIINarrower topic: Clement’s election established the Avignon obedience that made the schism a lasting institutional split.John XXIIINarrower topic: The competing papal obediences created the political opening for Cossa’s claim.Crisis of the Late Middle AgesRelated: Competing papal claims deepened a crisis of religious authority amid wider instability.History of the Catholic ChurchRelated: Competing popes exposed the difficulty of resolving disputes over supreme Church authority.History of the papacyBroader topic: Competing popes exposed the vulnerability of succession and institutional unity.
KnowraWestern SchismLinked fromLinked fromThe 24 pages that link to Western Schism, each with the reason it gives.All 24Broader topic 6Related 13Narrower topic 4Compared with 1University of ParisRelated: The university’s theologians and masters took part in debates over ending the division.Avignon PapacyRelated: The disputed election after Gregory XI’s return turned tensions surrounding the Avignon papacy into rival obediences.Papal supremacyRelated: Competing popes raised a practical crisis for claims of unique supreme authority.PopeBroader topic: It fractured obedience to the papacy and forced the Church to resolve competing claims.Council of ConstanceNarrower topic: Ending these competing papal claims was the council’s most urgent task.Jan HusRelated: Competing popes sharpened Hus’s claim that a pope’s authority depended on faithful conduct.ConciliarismRelated: Competing popes prompted arguments that a council could restore unity and judge papal claimants.PapacyRelated: Competing papal claims weakened confidence in the institution’s unity.Catherine of SienaRelated: Catherine’s support for Urban VI came amid this crisis of papal legitimacy.Council of BaselNarrower topic: The schism made church unity and the limits of papal authority urgent questions.Papal monarchyBroader topic: Rival popes undermined the credibility of a single, centralized source of authority.Hussite WarsRelated: The divided church formed the wider setting for disputes over reform and authority.Pope Martin VRelated: Martin V’s election at Constance ended this long contest among rival papal claimants.AvignonRelated: The schism prolonged Avignon’s papal significance after the popes returned to Rome.Late Middle AgesBroader topic: Competing popes made the period’s crisis of church authority visible.Pope Boniface VIIIRelated: The later crisis deepened questions of papal authority that Boniface’s pontificate had sharpened.Pope John XXIICompared with: Unlike John’s single papal reign at Avignon, this later crisis divided obedience among competing claimants.Pope Urban VIBroader topic: Urban’s election began the schism when cardinals rejected his authority and elected a rival.AntipopeBroader topic: Its competing papal lines made the distinction between pope and antipope especially consequential.Clement VIINarrower topic: Clement’s election established the Avignon obedience that made the schism a lasting institutional split.John XXIIINarrower topic: The competing papal obediences created the political opening for Cossa’s claim.Crisis of the Late Middle AgesRelated: Competing papal claims deepened a crisis of religious authority amid wider instability.History of the Catholic ChurchRelated: Competing popes exposed the difficulty of resolving disputes over supreme Church authority.History of the papacyBroader topic: Competing popes exposed the vulnerability of succession and institutional unity.