Linked from

The 67 pages that link to Civic nationalism, each with the reason it gives.

• National identityCompared with: It contrasts with definitions that make ancestry or inherited culture decisive.

• Ethnic nationalismCompared with: It offers a citizenship-based alternative to ethnic nationalism’s cultural or ancestral criteria.

• Romantic nationalismCompared with: It contrasts cultural inheritance with a nation defined primarily by civic membership.

• MulticulturalismCompared with: Civic nationalism emphasizes a common political identity, while multiculturalism foregrounds cultural plurality.

• Cultural identityCompared with: It offers a political basis for belonging distinct from shared cultural heritage.

• Turkish nationalismCompared with: It provides a benchmark for judging whether Turkish nationhood is civic or ethnocultural.

• German nationalismCompared with: It contrasts with definitions of German nationhood grounded chiefly in ancestry, language, or culture.

• Russian nationalismCompared with: It contrasts with ethnic definitions of Russian nationhood based on ancestry or culture.

• Identity politicsCompared with: It offers a political identity centered on common citizenship rather than narrower social-group affiliation.

• Polish national identityCompared with: It contrasts with definitions of Polishness grounded primarily in descent, language, or religion.

• Cultural nationalismCompared with: It offers a competing basis for national belonging when cultural unity is not the defining criterion.

• Hindu nationalismCompared with: It contrasts with definitions of Indian nationhood centered on Hindu cultural identity.

• Johann Gottfried HerderCompared with: It contrasts with cultural accounts of national belonging often associated with Herder’s reception.

• Korean nationalismCompared with: It contrasts with ancestry-centered definitions of Korean belonging.

• HindutvaCompared with: It offers a contrasting basis for national membership to Hindutva’s emphasis on Hindu heritage.

• Spanish nationalismCompared with: It contrasts with accounts of Spanishness grounded chiefly in ancestry, language, religion, or cultural tradition.

• Cultural pluralismCompared with: It offers a common political identity that can include culturally distinct groups.

• Civic virtueCompared with: It frames public commitment through shared political membership rather than inherited identity.

• French national identityCompared with: It captures the republican claim that commitment to France can outweigh ancestry.

• Greek nationalismCompared with: Its civic basis contrasts with ethnic, linguistic, and religious strands of Greek nationalism.

• LocalismCompared with: Its civic basis contrasts with localist disputes over Hong Kong identity and political belonging.

• White nationalismCompared with: It offers a contrasting basis for national membership that does not require white ancestry.

• French nationalismCompared with: It captures the republican ideal that belonging to France rests on citizenship rather than ancestry.

• National mythCompared with: Its inclusive ideal contrasts with myths grounded in ethnic descent.

• Polish NationalismCompared with: It contrasts with ethnic definitions of Polish nationhood, especially in debates about minorities.

• Thai nationalismCompared with: It contrasts with accounts of Thai belonging that emphasize cultural heritage and national institutions.

• National conservatismCompared with: It offers a more explicitly citizenship-based account of national belonging.

• Ukrainian nationalismCompared with: It contrasts with ethnic definitions of nationhood and supports an inclusive Ukrainian political identity.

• British nationalismCompared with: It offers an inclusive model of British identity based on common civic membership.

• Ethnic federalismCompared with: It contrasts with systems that organize political membership and territory around ethnic communities.

• Hungarian nationalismCompared with: It contrasts with ethnic definitions that shaped many disputes over language and belonging.

• Czech national identityCompared with: It contrasts with accounts that place Czech language and historical culture at the center.

• Russian national identityCompared with: It contrasts with ethnic accounts that make ancestry, language, or religion decisive.

• Soviet nationalities policyCompared with: Soviet policy formally organized many institutions around nationality rather than citizenship alone.

• Argentine nationalismCompared with: It contrasts with Argentine projects that emphasize ancestry, culture, or historical roots.

• Pan-nationalismCompared with: Its membership rests on civic allegiance, not necessarily cross-border cultural kinship.

• Turkish national identityCompared with: Its civic ideal clarifies the unresolved gap between legal membership and cultural definitions of Turkishness.

• Armenian nationalismCompared with: It contrasts with Armenian nationalisms that foreground ancestry, language, or historical continuity.

• Pan-IranismCompared with: It contrasts with Pan-Iranian appeals that may emphasize shared ancestry, language, or civilizational history.

• UltranationalismCompared with: Its inclusive basis of membership contrasts with ultranationalist exclusion by ancestry or identity.

• Zhonghua minzuCompared with: It offers a comparison for understanding the concept’s mixture of political membership and cultural identity.

• VolksgemeinschaftCompared with: It contrasts with Volksgemeinschaft’s racial test for membership.

• Anti-nationalismCompared with: Its inclusive account of membership is often offered against anti-nationalist objections.

• Left-wing nationalismCompared with: It offers one way to define the nation without making ethnic descent decisive.

• Anti-patriotismCompared with: It offers a form of national identification less dependent on ethnic or inherited allegiance.

• Gender and nationCompared with: Its universalist account of membership can obscure gendered barriers to equal citizenship.

• National-anarchismCompared with: It contrasts with national-anarchism’s emphasis on ethnic or cultural identity.

• Neo-nationalismCompared with: It contrasts with neo-nationalist appeals that emphasize cultural heritage or ethnic belonging.

• Pan-European nationalismCompared with: It offers a civic basis for European unity distinct from ancestry or cultural homogeneity.

• Socialist nationalismCompared with: It offers a national identity centered on citizenship rather than the social program emphasized here.