Linked from

The 53 pages that link to International Court of Justice, each with the reason it gives.

• International lawRelated: Its judgments and opinions clarify rules, though contentious jurisdiction depends on state consent.

• United Nations General AssemblyRelated: The assembly may request advisory opinions and elects the court’s judges with the Security Council.

• Genocide ConventionRelated: States can bring disputes over the Convention’s interpretation and application before this court.

• Territorial integrityRelated: The Court has addressed territorial claims and the legal limits of state conduct.

• International human rights lawRelated: It can address human-rights treaty disputes brought by states with jurisdictional consent.

• Aung San Suu KyiRelated: Suu Kyi represented Myanmar at its 2019 hearings on allegations of genocide against the Rohingya.

• International Whaling CommissionRelated: Its 2014 judgment found Japan’s JARPA II permits were not for purposes of scientific research under the convention.

• Russo-Georgian WarRelated: Georgia and Russia litigated a discrimination treaty dispute connected to the conflicts, but the court did not decide responsibility for the war.

• Arctic sovereigntyRelated: States may use it to resolve disputes over Arctic boundaries and maritime rights.

• State responsibilityRelated: Its cases continue to interpret and apply state-responsibility rules.

• Grand Ethiopian Renaissance DamRelated: Legal avenues are sometimes raised in debate over how Nile disputes might be resolved.

• Rohingya refugee crisisRelated: It is hearing The Gambia’s case alleging Myanmar violated the Genocide Convention.

• Genocide recognitionRelated: It can determine state responsibility under the Genocide Convention, a legal route distinct from declarations by governments.

• Rohingya genocideRelated: The Gambia brought a genocide case against Myanmar before this court.

• East JerusalemRelated: Its advisory opinions have addressed the legal consequences of Israeli policies in occupied Palestinian territory.

• Chagos Archipelago sovereignty disputeRelated: It issued the 2019 advisory opinion that the decolonization of Mauritius was not lawfully completed.

• Goukouni OueddeiRelated: Its 1994 ruling awarded the Aouzou Strip to Chad, closing a major chapter of Libyan intervention.

• Territorial disputeRelated: States sometimes submit territorial claims for a binding judicial decision.

• Uruguay RiverRelated: Argentina and Uruguay brought their pulp-mill dispute on the river before the court.

• British Indian Ocean TerritoryRelated: Its 2019 advisory opinion addressed the United Kingdom’s administration of the Chagos Archipelago.

• Toyota WarRelated: In 1994 it ruled that the Aouzou Strip belonged to Chad.

• Rohingya peopleRelated: The Gambia’s case against Myanmar concerns alleged violations of the Genocide Convention against Rohingya.

• Football WarRelated: El Salvador and Honduras later pursued their border dispute before the Court.

• Public international lawRelated: Its judgments and opinions clarify rules, though contentious jurisdiction generally depends on state consent.

• Agacher Strip WarRelated: Burkina Faso and Mali later asked the Court to determine their disputed frontier.

• Chadian–Libyan WarRelated: It ruled in 1994 that the Aouzou Strip belonged to Chad.

• Greater and Lesser TunbsRelated: The UAE has called for the dispute to be resolved peacefully through negotiation or international adjudication.

• Hawar IslandsRelated: Its 2001 judgment awarded the Hawar Islands to Bahrain.

• Liancourt RocksRelated: Japan has proposed submitting the dispute to the Court; South Korea has rejected that proposal.

• United Nations resolutionRelated: The Court has explained how UN resolutions may bear on legal obligations and state practice.