Linked from

The 73 pages that link to International Criminal Court, each with the reason it gives.

• Nuremberg TrialsRelated: Its jurisdiction reflects later efforts to institutionalize principles advanced at Nuremberg.

• Rule of lawRelated: Individual criminal accountability extends legal responsibility to senior officials.

• International humanitarian lawRelated: It can prosecute individuals for war crimes when jurisdictional requirements are met.

• War crimeRelated: The Court can prosecute war crimes within its jurisdiction when national proceedings do not genuinely address them.

• GenocideRelated: It can prosecute genocide when jurisdictional requirements are met.

• Crimes against humanityRelated: It can prosecute crimes against humanity when jurisdiction and admissibility requirements are met.

• Genocide ConventionRelated: Its Rome Statute incorporates the Convention’s definition of genocide for individual prosecutions.

• International Criminal Tribunal for the former YugoslaviaRelated: The ICTY’s practice informed debates and legal development surrounding permanent international criminal justice.

• Universal jurisdictionRelated: Its treaty-based authority raises questions about how international prosecutions relate to national universal-jurisdiction cases.

• Nuremberg principlesRelated: Its jurisdiction carries forward the principle that international crimes can incur personal liability.

• International criminal lawRelated: It is the principal permanent court created specifically to prosecute international crimes.

• Amnesty InternationalRelated: Amnesty advocated for a permanent international court and continues to press for accountability.

• International Military TribunalRelated: The tribunal’s precedent contributed to the longer development of permanent international criminal justice.

• Kofi AnnanRelated: Annan strongly supported the court as part of a stronger international justice system.

• Rome StatuteRelated: The Statute created this court and supplies its legal authority.

• Witness protectionRelated: The Court uses witness-protection measures in cases where testimony can expose people to danger.

• Omar al-BashirRelated: It issued arrest warrants for al-Bashir over alleged crimes in Darfur, testing the reach of international justice.

• Human Rights WatchRelated: Its investigations and advocacy can support accountability for grave international crimes.

• Kellogg–Briand PactRelated: Its jurisdiction over aggression raises modern questions about enforcing the norm against aggressive war.

• Armed conflictRelated: It can prosecute individuals accused of war crimes linked to armed conflict.

• Crime against peaceRelated: Its jurisdiction eventually included a modern version of the Nuremberg offense.

• Crime of aggressionRelated: It is the principal court with jurisdiction over the modern crime.

• Ellen Johnson SirleafRelated: Debates over accountability for Liberia’s wars intersected with Sirleaf’s decisions and the limits of domestic justice.

• Rohingya refugee crisisRelated: Its jurisdiction includes alleged crimes linked to deportation into Bangladesh.

• State of PalestineRelated: Palestine's accession to the Rome Statute enabled the Court to exercise jurisdiction over crimes within its jurisdiction in its territory.

• Darfur genocideRelated: It investigated Darfur after the UN Security Council referred the situation in 2005.

• Genocide recognitionRelated: Its prosecutions apply legal standards, though criminal judgments are distinct from political recognition.

• Rohingya genocideRelated: It authorized an investigation into alleged crimes against Rohingya partly occurring in Bangladesh.

• United Nations Human Rights CouncilRelated: Council investigations may preserve evidence or support accountability efforts, but the Court is institutionally separate.

• Genocide studiesRelated: Its cases connect classification debates to individual criminal responsibility.

• JanjaweedRelated: Its Darfur investigation examined crimes by Sudanese officials and militia forces.

• War crimes trialsRelated: It continues proceedings after conflicts when national authorities cannot or will not prosecute.

• War of aggressionRelated: It can prosecute the crime of aggression when jurisdictional requirements are met.

• Class A war crimesRelated: Its jurisdiction over aggression develops the postwar idea in a modern institution.

• Mia FarrowRelated: Farrow publicly supported accountability for crimes committed during the Darfur conflict.

• A. N. R. RobinsonRelated: Robinson helped advance the proposal for a permanent international criminal court during his presidency.

• Laurent GbagboRelated: The court tried Gbagbo over alleged crimes against humanity linked to the post-election crisis.

• UnilateralismRelated: States' decisions to join or reject its jurisdiction expose tensions between shared accountability and sovereign control.

• Law of warRelated: It can prosecute individuals for war crimes within its jurisdiction.

• Philippine drug warRelated: Its jurisdiction and investigation became consequential after the Philippines withdrew from the court.

• Shireen Abu AklehRelated: Palestinian authorities asked the court to investigate Abu Akleh’s killing as part of its Palestine investigation.

• Denis MukwegeRelated: Mukwege has urged accountability for grave crimes committed in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

• Geoffrey LawrenceRelated: Its legal project developed in a world reshaped by the precedent of Lawrence’s tribunal.

• History of human rightsRelated: It extends accountability for grave abuses beyond national courts in defined circumstances.

• Second Ivorian Civil WarRelated: The conflict’s aftermath led to high-profile prosecutions of figures from both political camps.

• Ben FerenczRelated: Ferencz spent decades advocating for the permanent court ultimately established in Rome.

• Crime of apartheidRelated: The Rome Statute made apartheid an expressly defined crime within the Court’s jurisdiction.

• Joseph KonyRelated: The Court issued arrest warrants for Kony and other LRA leaders.