Linked from

The 56 pages that link to Common-pool resource, each with the reason it gives.

• Collective actionRelated: Groups often need collective rules to manage shared resources and prevent overuse.

• PastoralismRelated: Shared grazing and water can create collective rules and resource conflicts.

• Land tenureRelated: Shared land and grazing areas often require rules for access and use.

• Property rightsRelated: Its characteristics make the design of access and use rights especially consequential.

• Land useRelated: Shared pastures, forests, and fisheries raise governance problems in land management.

• Institutional economicsRelated: Its governance shows how communities can manage shared resources through locally adapted rules.

• Nomadic pastoralismRelated: Shared pastures and water sources require ways to coordinate access and prevent conflict.

• Rent-seekingRelated: Political contests over access can reward privileged users while encouraging costly competition for extraction rights.

• InstitutionsRelated: Shared resources expose how institutional rules can prevent overuse and conflict.

• Political ecologyRelated: Shared forests, fisheries, and water systems make conflicts over access visible.

• ScarcityRelated: Competing users can overuse a scarce shared resource without effective rules.

• Environmental economicsRelated: Many fisheries, forests, and aquifers fit this pattern.

• Subsistence economyRelated: Shared land, forests, and fisheries may supply necessities to subsistence communities.

• Subsistence fishingRelated: Shared fish stocks create competition among households and other fishing groups.

• Rural developmentRelated: Rural projects often depend on governing shared land, forests, water, or grazing areas.

• Sacred grovesRelated: Grove governance can limit extraction from resources shared by nearby communities.

• Common ownershipRelated: These resources make collective rules necessary because exclusion is difficult and use can deplete them.

• Sacred natural sitesRelated: Forests, fisheries, and water around sacred places may require shared rules to prevent overuse.

• Economic efficiencyRelated: Its incentives can produce overuse even when coordinated management could raise total value.

• Environmental governanceRelated: Such resources create governance challenges around access, restraint, and collective benefit.

• Sustainable harvestingRelated: Shared harvest grounds create incentives and governance challenges that shape long-term use.

• Resource extractionRelated: Shared resources raise governance questions that private extraction can intensify.

• Tipping pointRelated: Shared resources can approach ecological thresholds when individual incentives encourage overuse.

• CommunalismRelated: These resources create the coordination problems communal institutions are designed to manage.

• SubsistenceRelated: Shared land, fisheries, and forests can supply subsistence while requiring rules for access.

• Natural resourceRelated: Many shared resources, such as fisheries, face depletion when access is hard to restrict.

• Social ownershipRelated: Shared resource governance exposes coordination problems that collective ownership must address.

• BioregionalismRelated: Shared waters and ecosystems require rules that coordinate users across a bioregion.

• Environmental degradationRelated: Shared resources raise governance questions when individual use contributes to collective depletion.

• Natural resource economicsRelated: Shared access can drive overuse when individual incentives ignore costs imposed on other users.

• Environmental resource managementRelated: Shared fisheries, forests, and water systems raise distinctive allocation and enforcement problems.

• Land change scienceRelated: Shared forests and grazing lands raise governance questions central to land outcomes.

• Territorial governanceRelated: Shared land, water, and ecosystems often require governance across territorial jurisdictions.