Linked from
The 56 pages that link to Common-pool resource, each with the reason it gives.
Collective actionRelated: Groups often need collective rules to manage shared resources and prevent overuse.
PastoralismRelated: Shared grazing and water can create collective rules and resource conflicts.
Public goodsCompared with: It shares non-excludability with public goods but differs because use is rival.
Land tenureRelated: Shared land and grazing areas often require rules for access and use.
Property rightsRelated: Its characteristics make the design of access and use rights especially consequential.
Community-based conservationNarrower topic: Many community conservation efforts govern shared resources with these collective-action challenges.
Market failureBroader topic: Uncoordinated users can overuse shared resources because they do not bear the full depletion cost.
FisheriesNarrower topic: Wild fish stocks fit this resource type, creating shared-access management problems.
Land useRelated: Shared pastures, forests, and fisheries raise governance problems in land management.
Institutional economicsRelated: Its governance shows how communities can manage shared resources through locally adapted rules.
Nomadic pastoralismRelated: Shared pastures and water sources require ways to coordinate access and prevent conflict.
Rent-seekingRelated: Political contests over access can reward privileged users while encouraging costly competition for extraction rights.
Tragedy of the commonsNarrower topic: The tragedy arises when many users draw from this subtractable resource without effective limits.
Elinor OstromNarrower topic: This resource type anchors Ostrom’s study of forests, fisheries, irrigation systems, and other shared goods.
InstitutionsRelated: Shared resources expose how institutional rules can prevent overuse and conflict.
Political ecologyRelated: Shared forests, fisheries, and water systems make conflicts over access visible.
ScarcityRelated: Competing users can overuse a scarce shared resource without effective rules.
Environmental economicsRelated: Many fisheries, forests, and aquifers fit this pattern.
Subsistence economyRelated: Shared land, forests, and fisheries may supply necessities to subsistence communities.
Subsistence fishingRelated: Shared fish stocks create competition among households and other fishing groups.
CommonsBroader topic: Many commons govern resources with these defining access and use problems.
PropertyCompared with: It exposes the tension between individual control and shared, depletable resources.
Water rightsNarrower topic: Shared water often has these characteristics, shaping collective governance.
Community-Based Natural Resource ManagementNarrower topic: Many community-managed resources fit this category, making collective rules necessary.
Resource allocationBroader topic: Uncontrolled access can overuse resources that no single claimant can reserve.
Rural developmentRelated: Rural projects often depend on governing shared land, forests, water, or grazing areas.
Water resource managementNarrower topic: Water often has these traits, explaining why rules are needed to manage shared use.
Common landNarrower topic: Common land often has these resource characteristics, making rules necessary to limit competing uses.
Sacred grovesRelated: Grove governance can limit extraction from resources shared by nearby communities.
Common ownershipRelated: These resources make collective rules necessary because exclusion is difficult and use can deplete them.
Public goods gameCompared with: Unlike the game's non-rival public good, shared resources can be depleted through overuse.
Sacred natural sitesRelated: Forests, fisheries, and water around sacred places may require shared rules to prevent overuse.
Collective farmingNarrower topic: Land, water, and grazing can require collective rules when farms share them.
Economic efficiencyRelated: Its incentives can produce overuse even when coordinated management could raise total value.
Environmental governanceRelated: Such resources create governance challenges around access, restraint, and collective benefit.
Environmental policyNarrower topic: Environmental policy often manages shared resources vulnerable to overuse.
Social dilemmaNarrower topic: These resources are especially vulnerable to the incentives behind social dilemmas.
Sustainable harvestingRelated: Shared harvest grounds create incentives and governance challenges that shape long-term use.
Resource extractionRelated: Shared resources raise governance questions that private extraction can intensify.
Tipping pointRelated: Shared resources can approach ecological thresholds when individual incentives encourage overuse.
CommodityCompared with: Shared resources may be governed collectively rather than treated as commodities.
CommunalismRelated: These resources create the coordination problems communal institutions are designed to manage.
Freshwater fisheriesNarrower topic: Open access to fish can create competition unless institutions coordinate use.
SubsistenceRelated: Shared land, fisheries, and forests can supply subsistence while requiring rules for access.
Natural resourceRelated: Many shared resources, such as fisheries, face depletion when access is hard to restrict.
Social ownershipRelated: Shared resource governance exposes coordination problems that collective ownership must address.
Garrett HardinNarrower topic: Hardin’s pasture illustrates how subtractable resources with open access can invite overuse.
Natural resource managementNarrower topic: Many managed resources share the governance challenges of subtractable, hard-to-exclude use.
BioregionalismRelated: Shared waters and ecosystems require rules that coordinate users across a bioregion.
Ecological anthropologyBroader topic: Shared resources reveal how institutions and cultural norms regulate collective environmental use.