Linked from

The 50 pages that link to European Court of Human Rights, each with the reason it gives.

• Human rightsRelated: It shows how an individual can bring a rights claim before a regional court.

• International Court of JusticeCompared with: Individuals can bring cases there; contentious proceedings before the ICJ are between states.

• European Convention on Human RightsRelated: It hears individual applications and inter-state cases alleging Convention violations.

• Minority rightsRelated: Its judgments can address discrimination and religious, linguistic, or political claims affecting minorities.

• Dayton AgreementRelated: Its Sejdić and Finci judgment found that Dayton’s electoral rules excluded citizens outside designated ethnic groups.

• Judicial independenceRelated: Its case law treats independent tribunals as a condition of fair trial rights.

• Council of EuropeBroader topic: Individuals and states can bring cases against member states under the convention.

• StrasbourgRelated: Its Strasbourg seat reinforces the city’s association with human-rights law.

• Freedom of associationRelated: Its judgments define how Article 11 applies to unions, parties, and other groups.

• International human rights lawBroader topic: It illustrates a regional system allowing individuals to bring cases against states.

• Court of Justice of the European UnionCompared with: Despite its similar name, it belongs to the Council of Europe, not the EU judicial system.

• European Court of JusticeCompared with: Unlike the EU Court, it belongs to the Council of Europe and applies a separate human-rights treaty.

• European Union lawCompared with: It is distinct from the EU Court of Justice and applies a different treaty system.

• Russo-Georgian WarRelated: Its 2021 judgment found Russia exercised effective control over South Ossetia and Abkhazia after the ceasefire.

• Legal certaintyRelated: Its judgments assess whether legal rules let people foresee their consequences.

• Silvio BerlusconiRelated: The court reviewed the human-rights implications of Italy’s confiscation of Berlusconi’s parliamentary seat.

• Abdullah ÖcalanRelated: Its 2005 judgment found serious fair-trial violations in Öcalan’s original trial, while rejecting several other complaints.

• University of StrasbourgRelated: Its Strasbourg location complements the university’s work in law and human rights.

• Greek monarchyRelated: It heard the former royal family’s property case against Greece.

• Inter-American Court of Human RightsCompared with: It is a parallel regional court, but operates under a different treaty and procedure.

• United Nations Human Rights CouncilCompared with: Its judgments bind states under a regional treaty system; Council resolutions generally do not.

• Chechen–Russian conflictRelated: It issued judgments concerning abuses and disappearances linked to the wars.

• Court of Arbitration for SportCompared with: It reviews state responsibility for rights violations, rather than serving as CAS’s ordinary appeals tribunal.

• Ilham AliyevRelated: Its cases have examined allegations involving Azerbaijani political prisoners and state conduct.

• Inter-American Commission on Human RightsCompared with: Unlike the Commission, it is a court and can receive individual applications directly.

• Supreme Court of the United KingdomCompared with: It is not a United Kingdom court and does not sit above the Supreme Court in the domestic hierarchy.

• Internally displaced persons in GeorgiaRelated: Its cases have addressed displacement, property, and return rights arising from Georgia’s conflicts.

• Life imprisonmentRelated: Its case law has addressed whether life sentences offer a meaningful prospect of review.

• Beslan school siegeRelated: The court found Russia responsible for failures in preventing the attack and planning the rescue.

• Alexander LitvinenkoRelated: In 2021 it held Russia responsible for Litvinenko’s killing under the Convention.

• Anna PolitkovskayaRelated: It found Russia responsible for failing to conduct an effective investigation into her murder.

• Caster SemenyaRelated: It reviewed Switzerland’s handling of Semenya’s legal challenge to the eligibility rules.

• DerogationRelated: Its judgments have shaped the interpretation of Article 15.

• Georgian–Ossetian conflictRelated: Its judgments addressed responsibility for human-rights violations connected to the 2008 conflict and its aftermath.

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European UnionCompared with: It belongs to the Council of Europe system, not the EU institutions applying the Charter.

• MelillaRelated: Its judgments have addressed Spain’s treatment of people intercepted at Melilla’s border.

• Mikhail KhodorkovskyRelated: Khodorkovsky’s applications brought aspects of his detention and trial before an international court.

• Moscow theater hostage crisisRelated: Its 2011 judgment examined Russia’s planning, rescue operation, and emergency medical response.

• Claudia PechsteinRelated: Its 2018 judgment found a violation of Pechstein’s right to a public hearing in arbitration.

• Igor GirkinCompared with: Its state-responsibility findings concerning MH17 are separate from Girkin’s individual criminal conviction.

• NiqabRelated: It assessed whether France's face-covering ban violated rights relevant to niqab wearers.

• René CassinRelated: Cassin helped build the European human-rights system whose court enforces the convention.

• Hrant DinkRelated: In 2010 it found Turkey responsible for failing to protect Dink and investigate credible threats adequately.

• Secularism in FranceRelated: Its judgments assess French restrictions on religious expression against European rights protections.

• Khadija IsmayilovaRelated: It ruled on Azerbaijan’s failure to investigate threats against her.

• Law of ItalyRelated: It can find Italy responsible for Convention violations after domestic remedies are exhausted.

• Law of PolandRelated: Its judgments have addressed questions about Polish courts and fair-trial rights.

• Law of RussiaRelated: Its past jurisdiction over Russia shaped debates about domestic law and international obligations.

• Poisoning of Alexander LitvinenkoRelated: In 2021, it found Russia responsible for Litvinenko’s death under the Convention.

• Purges in Turkey following the 2016 Turkish coup attemptRelated: Its judgments and admissibility decisions addressed claims arising from emergency measures.