Linked from

The 71 pages that link to Human–computer interaction, each with the reason it gives.

• Turn-takingNarrower topic: Voice interfaces must detect when a person has finished speaking or expects a response.

• AffordanceNarrower topic: Interface designers use affordance concepts to explain how visual elements suggest or enable actions.

• Graphical user interfaceNarrower topic: GUIs became a defining subject and practical setting for this broader field.

• TouchscreenNarrower topic: Touchscreens make interface design depend directly on physical gestures and screen layout.

• Web designNarrower topic: It provides broader models for understanding how people use websites and interfaces.

• Usability testingNarrower topic: Usability testing draws on this field’s methods for studying interaction.

• User interface designNarrower topic: Interface design is one practical part of this broader field.

• Participatory designNarrower topic: Participatory design became a prominent approach within this broader design and research field.

• Wearable technologyNarrower topic: Wearable interfaces must fit into movement, attention, and daily routines.

• Computer mouseNarrower topic: Mouse design shapes how people issue commands through graphical interfaces.

• Recommender systemNarrower topic: Interface choices determine how recommendations are explained, controlled, and acted upon.

• User interfaceNarrower topic: User interfaces are a central subject of this broader discipline.

• Brain–computer interfaceNarrower topic: Brain interfaces are one interaction approach among touch, speech, and other input methods.

• Game controllerNarrower topic: Controller layout is an interface-design problem shaped by human movement and perception.

• Voice user interfaceNarrower topic: Voice interfaces are one way people communicate with interactive systems.

• Information designNarrower topic: Digital information design often depends on how interfaces support user action.

• Interactive artNarrower topic: Interactive artworks use its methods to make audience actions legible to machines.

• Explainable artificial intelligenceNarrower topic: Explanations must be designed for human interpretation and decision-making, not only mathematical fidelity.

• Interaction designNarrower topic: It is the broader research field that includes interaction design practice.

• Latency (engineering)Narrower topic: Input-to-display delay affects how direct and controllable an interface feels.

• User experience designNarrower topic: UX design draws on this broader discipline’s methods and models.

• Input deviceNarrower topic: Input devices are one side of the interaction between people and computers.

• J. C. R. LickliderNarrower topic: Licklider’s emphasis on interactive partnership helped shape this broader field.

• Computer-supported cooperative workNarrower topic: HCI is a broader field; CSCW gives particular attention to interaction among people through technology.

• Video game accessibilityNarrower topic: Its methods help assess whether game interfaces are usable and understandable.

• Input/outputNarrower topic: I/O devices mediate the signals through which people interact with computers.

• Pointing deviceNarrower topic: Pointing devices are physical channels through which people interact with computers.

• Jony IveNarrower topic: Ive’s hardware decisions were closely tied to the way Apple devices were operated.

• Interactive mediaNarrower topic: It explains how interactive media translate human actions into system responses.

• Chieko AsakawaNarrower topic: Asakawa's research treats accessibility as a central question of interaction design.

• Computer GoNarrower topic: Go analysis tools show how engine suggestions can reshape human study and decision-making.

• CyberpsychologyNarrower topic: Cyberpsychology contributes evidence about the human responses that interface design should accommodate.

• Google effectNarrower topic: Interface design influences whether digital tools support learning or substitute for recall.

• Sex dollNarrower topic: Interactive dolls raise design questions about embodiment, agency, and user expectations.