Linked from

The 28 pages that link to Social comparison theory, each with the reason it gives.

• Social mobilityRelated: Perceived movement depends partly on comparison with other people's positions and trajectories.

• Self-conceptRelated: Comparisons help establish where a person sees their abilities and standing relative to others.

• Self-esteemRelated: Comparisons with other people can shape judgments about personal standing and value.

• Beauty standardRelated: Comparisons with admired or prevalent appearances can shape personal judgments of attractiveness.

• Group polarizationRelated: Members may adopt stronger positions to appear favorably aligned with perceived group norms.

• Conspicuous consumptionRelated: Comparisons help turn visible possessions into cues about relative standing.

• Pluralistic ignoranceRelated: Pluralistic ignorance arises when people use others’ visible behavior to infer attitudes inaccurately.

• JealousyRelated: A rival can become a salient comparison point, intensifying perceived inadequacy and threat.

• Peer groupRelated: Peers often provide nearby reference points for judging status and ability.

• InstagramRelated: Curated images of other lives can invite upward comparison among Instagram users.

• EnvyRelated: Envy often begins when comparison makes another person's advantage feel personally significant.

• SchadenfreudeRelated: Another person’s setback can improve one’s relative standing without changing one’s own circumstances.

• Hedonic treadmillRelated: Comparisons can reset what feels like an adequate level of success or comfort.

• ResentmentRelated: Unfavorable comparisons can make unequal treatment or rewards feel especially salient.

• Leon FestingerBroader topic: Festinger proposed this theory to explain how people assess their opinions and abilities.

• Body image disturbanceRelated: Appearance comparisons can shape satisfaction and perceived shortcomings.

• Role modelRelated: People use admired figures as benchmarks for judging their own progress and possibilities.

• Contrast effectRelated: Comparisons with people who differ in ability can shift self-evaluation in contrastive directions.

• Digital media use and mental healthRelated: Curated posts can turn online exposure into repeated comparison with idealized lives.

• Illusory superiorityRelated: Choosing comparison targets can make self-evaluations seem more favorable.

• Inferiority complexRelated: Comparisons with others can intensify or ease perceived inadequacy.

• Intrapersonal communicationCompared with: Self-evaluation can depend on external comparisons, not only internal dialogue.

• Stanley SchachterRelated: Schachter’s affiliation findings helped motivate research on comparison under uncertainty.

• Cheerleader effectRelated: It concerns comparisons among people, rather than perceptual averaging of their faces.

• CyberpsychologyRelated: Feeds make other people’s curated lives frequent material for self-evaluation.

• Diderot effectRelated: Comparisons can shape which possessions seem appropriate for a newly acquired item.

• Pro-anaRelated: Weight and food comparisons can intensify self-evaluation in pro-ana communities.

• Worse-than-average effectRelated: Judgments of being below average depend on comparisons with an imagined or known group.