Linked from

The 137 pages that link to Nuremberg Trials, each with the reason it gives.

• Adolf HitlerRelated: The trials established legal accountability for crimes committed under Hitler’s regime.

• The HolocaustRelated: They established public records of Nazi crimes and advanced individual accountability under international law.

• International humanitarian lawRelated: They established influential precedents for individual responsibility for wartime crimes.

• International Criminal CourtRelated: They established precedents for holding individuals accountable under international law.

• Natural lawRelated: The trials raised questions about individual responsibility beyond the defenses of domestic law.

• War crimeRelated: The International Military Tribunal affirmed individual responsibility for violations of the laws of war.

• Command responsibilityRelated: Nuremberg advanced individual accountability for leaders, alongside related but distinct theories of liability.

• Holocaust denialRelated: Testimony and documents presented at trial helped establish Nazi crimes through perpetrator evidence.

• Nazi PartyRelated: The trials addressed the responsibility of regime leaders for Nazi crimes.

• Genocide ConventionRelated: Their proceedings exposed the limits of existing law that the Convention sought to address.

• Hermann GöringRelated: Göring was the highest-ranking Nazi defendant at the International Military Tribunal.

• Conscientious objectionRelated: The trials emphasized that following orders does not erase individual responsibility for crimes.

• Holocaust memoryRelated: The trials publicly assembled evidence and established an early framework for accountability.

• GestapoRelated: The Gestapo was declared a criminal organization, with defined exceptions for certain members.

• Erich von MansteinRelated: Manstein’s case unfolded amid broader efforts to establish responsibility for Nazi crimes.

• Potsdam ConferenceRelated: The conference agreed to prosecute war criminals jointly rather than execute them by list.

• Operation ReinhardRelated: Postwar prosecutions addressed crimes within the wider Nazi system of mass murder.

• Nazi concentration campsRelated: Evidence about camp persecution and murder helped establish criminal responsibility for Nazi atrocities.

• Rome StatuteRelated: Their precedents helped shape the idea of individual accountability that informed the treaty.

• BASFRelated: The IG Farben trial addressed corporate leaders’ roles in wartime crimes.

• Wannsee ConferenceRelated: Documents about Nazi administration, including the conference record, informed postwar investigations.

• Commissar OrderRelated: Postwar proceedings made the order evidence in prosecutions of German military leaders.

• LuftwaffeRelated: The trials established accountability for Nazi crimes committed by the regime the Luftwaffe served.

• Nazi persecution of JewsRelated: The trials brought evidence of persecution and mass murder before an international court.

• WehrmachtRelated: The trials addressed criminal organizations and established a record of Nazi crimes.

• Holocaust testimonyRelated: Survivor and witness statements entered the public record as evidence of Nazi crimes.

• Kellogg–Briand PactRelated: Prosecutors invoked the pact in arguing that aggressive war was an international crime.

• SchutzstaffelRelated: The tribunal declared the SS a criminal organization, with exceptions for people not shown to have joined or participated in its crimes.

• Albert SpeerRelated: Speer’s defense and conviction at the International Military Tribunal shaped his public legacy.

• Buchenwald concentration campRelated: They placed camp crimes within the broader legal reckoning with Nazi rule.

• Carl SchmittRelated: Schmitt was detained and questioned after the war but was not indicted at the trials.

• NazismRelated: They established legal accountability for central Nazi leaders and policies.

• VergangenheitsbewältigungRelated: The trials publicly documented crimes and challenged claims that responsibility belonged only to a few leaders.

• Forced labor under Nazi GermanyRelated: The trials addressed deportation and forced labor as crimes and examined officials' responsibility.

• National SocialismRelated: They established public records of Nazi crimes and advanced prosecution of international crimes.

• Nazi racial ideologyRelated: The trials documented crimes carried out in the name of Nazi racial rule.

• Eichmann trialRelated: They established an earlier model for prosecuting Nazi crimes, though Eichmann faced an Israeli court.

• Holocaust historiographyRelated: The trials assembled documentary and testimonial evidence that later historians scrutinized.

• Holocaust survivor testimonyRelated: Survivors gave evidence in legal proceedings addressing Nazi crimes.

• Raphael LemkinRelated: Lemkin pressed for genocide to be recognized, but the Nuremberg Charter did not establish it as a separate crime.

• Reich Security Main OfficeRelated: Evidence about RSHA institutions and personnel helped document the regime’s crimes.

• Waffen-SSRelated: The tribunal addressed the SS’s criminal character and specified conditions for its members’ culpability.

• Deportation of Jews during the HolocaustRelated: Evidence about deportations helped establish responsibility for crimes against humanity.

• Genocide studiesRelated: Their limits in addressing group destruction helped spur arguments for a distinct crime.

• Hunger PlanRelated: Evidence about occupation policy and starvation informed postwar investigations of Nazi crimes.

• Bombing of GuernicaRelated: The raid later entered discussion of German wartime conduct, though it was not prosecuted there.

• Concentration campRelated: Evidence about Nazi camps helped establish accountability for crimes committed through state systems.

• Myth of the clean WehrmachtRelated: The trials’ treatment of the Wehrmacht as an organization left room for veterans to claim the army itself was untainted.

• Racial antisemitismRelated: The trials documented and prosecuted crimes carried out under Nazi racial rule.

• Rudolf HössRelated: Höss gave evidence at the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg in 1946.